Tannoy Stirling III LZ Special Edition review

Proven ingredients result in an unexpected outcome Tested at £11,995 / $12,500 / AU$19,999

Floorstanding speakers: Tannoy Stirling III LZ Special Edition
(Image: © What Hi-Fi?)

What Hi-Fi? Verdict

Tannoy’s Stirling III LZ Special Edition speakers promise much but fail to deliver

Pros

  • +

    Direct and punchy delivery

  • +

    Impressive integration and even dispersion

  • +

    Neat cabinet construction

Cons

  • -

    Congested and compressed sonic presentation

  • -

    Lows lack definition and texture

  • -

    Could sound more refined and balanced

Why you can trust What Hi-Fi? Our expert team reviews products in dedicated test rooms, to help you make the best choice for your budget. Find out more about how we test.

Over the years Tannoy has become well known for its Prestige range of high-end speakers and rightly so. These speakers invariably couple one of the company’s more exotic Dual Concentric driver arrays (where the tweeter sits in the throat of the mid/bass unit) with a traditional-looking, usually large box and the result is almost always excellent. You have to be sympathetic to their olde-worlde appearance, of course, but even if you don’t like the look, it has always been easy to appreciate their sound. 

When the news broke about the release of the new Tannoy Stirling III LZ Special Edition, we couldn’t wait to have a listen. All the ingredients seemed in place for this to be a terrific product. 

Build & design

Floorstanding speakers: Tannoy Stirling III LZ Special Edition

(Image credit: What Hi-Fi?)

The speaker’s unfashionable wider-than-deep 85.5cm tall cabinet allows the fitment of a large (25cm) Dual Concentric driver array, and that combination gives so many on-paper advantages compared to more conventionally designed, less bulky alternatives. 

Those advantages include high sensitivity (93dB/W/m), strong low-end extension (Tannoy claims 29Hz within -6dB limits) and a very reassuring 500-watt peak power handling (125 watts continuous). Such a large driver in a relatively generously sized cabinet also promises strong dynamics and a sense of ease while delivering them that slimmer rivals equipped with smaller drivers, even using multiple units, never quite seem able to match.

That high claimed sensitivity has benefits too. It allows the use of some of the hugely talented but low-power amplifier designs on the market. These, often valve-based units, can have outputs that barely register above single-figures, but with a speaker as sensitive as this Tannoy they can still produce decent volume levels in most small to medium rooms.

Tannoy Stirling III LZ Special Edition tech specs

Floorstanding speakers: Tannoy Stirling III LZ Special Edition

(Image credit: What Hi-Fi?)

Type Floorstanders

Drive units Dual concentric array (52mm aluminium/magnesium dome tweeter and 25cm paper pulp mid/bass)

Ported? Yes ( front) 

Bi-wire? Yes

Impedance 8 ohms (minimum 5 ohms)

Sensitivity 93dB

Dimensions (hwd) 85.5 x 39.7 x 36.8cm

Weight 33.2kg

Finishes x1 (oiled walnut)

The III LZ in the Stirling name is a reference to the much-loved ‘Monitor Red’ models from the 1960s. But apart from both using a 25cm dual concentric driver array and general configuration, there is little else in common. The driver array used in the Stirling is, of course, a far more modern interpretation of the Dual Concentric idea but the advantages of the concept against more conventional driver layouts remain unchanged. Such an arrangement, where the tweeter sits in the throat of the mid/bass unit, offers more consistent dispersion in all directions as well as the potential for improved integration and phase behaviour between the drivers.

The Dual Concentric used here features a ‘pepper pot’ waveguide for the 52mm aluminium/magnesium alloy dome tweeter which crosses over to the impressive-looking 25cm paper pulp mid/bass unit at a relatively low 1.1kHz. The Stirling’s low-end is tuned by a pair of ports that exit from each side of the front baffle around halfway up the cabinet. This port positioning should make the Stirlings less fussy about their exact proximity to a rear wall.

Floorstanding speakers: Tannoy Stirling III LZ Special Edition

(Image credit: What Hi-Fi?)

Look around the back of the speakers and you will notice a fifth binding post. Four of these are for bi-wiring, while the fifth should be connected to your amplifier’s chassis for grounding purposes. In our experience, this makes a subtle improvement in terms of clarity so is worth investigating, though we wouldn’t consider it essential.

If you appreciate fine carpentry then these speakers are a treat. They are a little ornate for our tastes but some of the cabinet detailing and metalwork is lovely. Though the Stirling’s braced cabinet construction isn’t particularly elaborate by the price standards, there is no denying the pleasing fit and finish, and the luxurious appearance of the oiled walnut veneer. Note that walnut is the only finish option. 

Compatibility

Floorstanding speakers: Tannoy Stirling III LZ Special Edition

(Image credit: What Hi-Fi?)

On a practical note, as these Tannoys weigh in at just over 33kg each we recommend you get a friend’s help to unpack them or, even better, get the dealer to do it (and set them up). They’re not unusually fussy about positioning. In our 3 x 7 x 5m (hwd) test room, the Stirlings sound relatively balanced at anything more than 30cm away from the wall behind them. We angle them in slightly towards the listening position to firm up the stereo imaging and need to tilt them back a little (using the floor spikes) to get the tweeter firing more towards our ear height at the listening position. This is something to note if your sofa or chair leaves your ear height well above the Stirling’s tweeter.

Any speaker at this level positively demands a top-class partnering system and these Tannoys are no different. Our sources are the Naim ND555/555 PS DR music streamer and the Technics SL-1000R/Kiseki Purpleheart MC record player, and they feed our usual Burmester 088/911 MkIII amplifier combination. We also have Naim’s Supernait 3 integrated amp to see how the Tannoys cope with more modest but still capable amplification. While very different in engineering approach, our reference ATC SCM50 offers a useful benchmark, showing what is possible at this kind of high-end price point.

Sound

Floorstanding speakers: Tannoy Stirling III LZ Special Edition

(Image credit: What Hi-Fi?)

We have to put our cards on the table here. Over the years we have heard many of Tannoy’s Prestige high-end speakers and loved them. It’s not so much the styling we like, but more the combination of generously proportioned cabinets and drive units working together to produce vividly dynamic yet still subtle results that while not the most tonally neutral or refined, seem to get right to the heart of the music. In our view, the Stirling III LZ Special Edition fall short of doing that.

They start off a little shouty and hard-edged but once given a few days to settle these traits fade, but don’t disappear. Partnering them with sweet-sounding amplification like Leben’s CS600X would help matters, but it’s also fair to say that our reference Burmester pre/power is hardly short of refinement.

Once we start listening, it becomes clear that these Tannoys are something of a mixed bag sonically. They have undoubted strengths in delivering the likes of Stravinsky’s The Rite Of Spring with impressive speed and punch. The leading edges of notes are defined with an unusual crispness and there is a pleasing sense of clarity about the presentation. These are direct, hard-hitting performers and can track low-level instrumental strands with ease, even when the music becomes demanding. They’re capable of a good sense of scale and, coupled with decent reach at the low end, that means an authoritative and muscular presentation.

Stereo imaging is another strength. The even dispersion characteristics of a Dual Concentric design usually mean a focused and stable soundstage, and so it proves here. The listening sweet spot is broader than most and the speakers remain consistent in character even when we move around our test room.

Tannoy Stirling III LZ Special Edition exploded diagram of speaker parts

(Image credit: Tannoy)

But unfortunately, it’s not all good news. There’s a lack of subtlety to the presentation that is surprising. While they have undoubted strengths, the Stirlings don’t quite exhibit the level of finesse, refinement and articulation that we would expect from a top-class speaker at this level. This comes through in the muted dynamic expression in Nina Simone’s My Baby Just Cares For Me as much as it does in the lack of emotion we feel in Yoyo Ma’s cello when listening to our old favourite, the Crouching Tiger, Hidden Dragon OST. It is a congested presentation that can’t render the space between instruments well and struggles to communicate the shifts from quiet to loud with the skill we would expect from speakers at this price point.

Tonally, these Tannoys sound lean and short of natural warmth through the midrange, leaving voices and instruments sounding thinner and harder than they should, which also contributes to a cluttered feel to the sound. We play around with the front panel settings for tweeter energy and roll-off but none of it helps as the issues have to do with quality rather than level.

Bass performance is also flawed. Tannoy’s engineers have worked hard on the porting arrangement in the cabinet, but the results aren’t great. The Stirling can dig relatively deeply, but compared to the ATC SCM50 speakers when playing bass fests like Hans Zimmer’s Interstellar OST or Massive Attack’s Heligoland set, there is a notable shortfall of grip and definition. A better grasp of rhythmic drive and greater timing precision in general would be nice too.

Verdict

Tannoy Stirling III LZ Special Edition speakers in test room

(Image credit: What Hi-Fi?)

In short, we’re disappointed. We have traditionally loved Tannoy’s higher-end efforts but while the Stirling III LZ Special Edition certainly mirror the appearance of those past greats, despite some good qualities they fall short of delivering the kind of sonic sophistication and substance expected at this elevated price level. 

SCORES

  • Sound 3
  • Build 4
  • Compatibility 4

MORE:

Read our review of the ATC SCM50

Also consider the Audiovector R3 Arreté 

Best floorstanding speakers: budget to premium

What Hi-Fi?

What Hi-Fi?, founded in 1976, is the world's leading independent guide to buying and owning hi-fi and home entertainment products. Our comprehensive tests help you buy the very best for your money, with our advice sections giving you step-by-step information on how to get even more from your music and movies. Everything is tested by our dedicated team of in-house reviewers in our custom-built test rooms in London, Reading and Bath. Our coveted five-star rating and Awards are recognised all over the world as the ultimate seal of approval, so you can buy with absolute confidence.

Read more about how we test

  • GSV Ethics Gradient
    Repulsive!
    Reply
  • atladude
    “Tonally, these Tannoys sound lean and short of natural warmth through the midrange, leaving voices and instruments sounding thinner and harder than they should, which also contributes to a cluttered feel to the sound. " --- This is precisely what a Tannoy sounds like when it hasn't had 1000 hours of heavy break-in time. This is a big driver doing the midrange here. Without loosening up the suspension, the midrange energy of the music isn't enough to move that big driver, and that frequency band loses fidelity and balance. Tannoys need a lot of hours, folks. Put in the time, and you'll be rewarded handsomely!
    Reply
  • Industry Expert
    @altadude Tannoy knows they need break-in. A company with UK roots (the Alnico driver is made in China) knows that What HiFi may be the most important review they get for this speaker. That's why they got it before anyone else. I suspect these were not just played...they were gone over with a fine-tooth comb.

    I was at Axpona, and instead of being played, these speakers were on top of a cabinet, silent. I was told they didn't sound good, and it was due to not being broken in. So to use that as a reason here doesn't make sense.
    Reply
  • atladude
    Industry Expert said:
    @altadude Tannoy knows they need break-in. A company with UK roots (the Alnico driver is made in China) knows that What HiFi may be the most important review they get for this speaker. That's why they got it before anyone else. I suspect these were not just played...they were gone over with a fine-tooth comb.

    I was at Axpona, and instead of being played, these speakers were on top of a cabinet, silent. I was told they didn't sound good, and it was due to not being broken in. So to use that as a reason here doesn't make sense.
    If you think the pair at Axpona was the same pair sent to What HiFi, I'm sure you are mistaken. That's a silly assumption. Further, this speaker uses the same driver as Kensington, which was also played last year at Axpona and everyone loved it. The Tannoy cabinets are going to have a minimal impact on midrange fidelity. Any Industry Expert who knows their Tannoys knows that the midrange issues pointed out in this review sound exactly like a Tannoy without enough break-in time.
    Reply
  • Industry Expert
    @altadude It's late here. I'm a bit knackered. Look, I'm not trying to throw a spanner in the works. I'm saying they know to break them in before sending them to the largest UK publication that, back in the day, gave Tannoy a good ink. They have not released a new model in how many years (not trying to be cheeky...I don't recall). So it seems critical.

    Do Tannoy drivers made in China have any bearing?
    Reply
  • SpeakerGuru
    I saw this video, and there was a question in the comments asking where the driver was made. It looks like the importer didn't answer. Does anyone know?
    jloSNU3s670:5View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jloSNU3s670&t=5s
    Reply
  • Industry Expert
    SpeakerGuru said:
    I saw this video, and there was a question in the comments asking where the driver was made. It looks like the importer didn't answer. Does anyone know?
    jloSNU3s670:5View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jloSNU3s670&t=5s

    The question wasn't as much about the drivers made in China. The question is, what is the address of the factory? Why didn't the U.S. importer answer the question? Is it in the UK or not?
    Reply
  • GSV Ethics Gradient
    Surely all that matters is how they sound? And look, for that matter...
    Reply
  • GraTX
    The review seems pretty spot on and the observations make a lot of sense.

    1. It would be extremely naïve of those sending out the speakers for what is probably their most important review not to run them in. One must assume they done at least that.

    2. Harping on about how the Kensingtons compare is neither here nor there. These were designed and voiced by engineers at Tannoy with decades of experience. Who knitted the crossovers for the new IIILZ and optimized the cabinet tuning? You actually need someone capable to do this. Tannoy's experienced engineers fled the nest years ago. Everything mechanical and acoustical is administered in China unless. Tannoy (aka - Behringer) promised an update, its been 'crickets' for years. Please introduce us to a single mechanical or electroaoustic engineer working for Tannoy in the UK. After all, it does say 'Designed & Manufactured' in the UK on the product.

    3. They do look good. But as far as the ownership is concerned its just a speaker in a piece of furniture.

    4. Entire UK based 'Tannoy' team shown (I do believe they have just started a new 'Brand Leader').
    No speaker design resource in there whatsoever.
    Reply
  • GraTX
    SpeakerGuru said:
    I saw this video, and there was a question in the comments asking where the driver was made. It looks like the importer didn't answer. Does anyone know?
    jloSNU3s670:5View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jloSNU3s670&t=5s
    The importer won't answer, the manufacturer won't answer, maybe trading standards should ask the same question?
    Reply