Epos ES-7N review

What Hi-Fi? Awards 2024 winner. Small box, flexible nature and a huge talent Tested at £1890 / $2850

Epos ES-7N standmount speakers on wooden table in front of bookcases
(Image: © What Hi-Fi?)

What Hi-Fi? Verdict

The Epos ES-7N are small, immensely capable and easy to accommodate. What’s not to like?

Pros

  • +

    Clear, forthright and expressive sound

  • +

    Fine dynamics and rhythmic drive

  • +

    Flexible nature

Cons

  • -

    Nothing special in the styling department

Why you can trust What Hi-Fi? Our expert team reviews products in dedicated test rooms, to help you make the best choice for your budget. Find out more about how we test.

Most people choose small speakers because they have a modest listening space or don’t want the speakers to dominate the room. Given these clear requirements, it is ironic that most compact models are still designed specifically to sound best when placed well away from walls. Some manufacturers even go as far as to call their smaller offerings ‘bookshelf’ designs, but take it from us that the vast majority of these won’t have been optimised to work there. 

Why would most speaker companies take such a contradictory design route? From an engineer’s point of view, doing things this way makes the design much easier given that they can (essentially) ignore the effects of the walls and focus on optimising performance. Given that the type of material used in the wall and even the support can make a significant difference to the way a speaker sounds, it is easy to understand why most prefer to avoid the complications. Epos hasn’t shirked the challenge in its new ES-7N standmounters.

Compatibility

Epos ES-7N standmount speakers showing binding posts at rear of one speaker

(Image credit: What Hi-Fi?)

The company has taken a practical approach to the situation, and it takes the form of a metal toggle switch on the ES-7N’s back panel. Click it up and the speakers are tuned for what the company calls a semi-free standing position, with the speakers on taller 70cm stands, typically 30-50cm from the rear wall. Most alternatives tend to need around 20-50cm more into the room to sound right. Move the switch down and the output through midrange and treble frequencies is raised relative to the bass, giving a surprisingly even sound when the speakers are used up against a wall or on (or even in) a bookshelf. 

Our first experience with the ES-7N speakers saw them placed inside of Ikea’s larger Kallax shelving units and it was surprising just how capable and even they sounded at the time.

Given that there is a change in the relative levels of bass and the higher frequencies, it is no surprise to find that the Epos’s sensitivity changes according to the position of the switch. They are rated at 89dB/W/m in the close-to-wall position and drop to 86dB/W/m when configured for semi-free space. Either way, their nominal impedance is rated at 4 ohms, which suggests that these speakers are demanding in terms of electrical load, but look at the published impedance curve and you will find that it is relatively gentle. We had no issue driving them with Rotel’s 30 watts per channel budget A8 integrated (£399 / $449 / AU$649), though given the Epos’s capabilities and price it is clear that more ambitious electronics are required.

Design & engineering

Epos ES-7N standmount speakers close up on Epos logo on front of speaker

(Image credit: What Hi-Fi?)

Let’s get more into the nuts and bolts of the ES-7N’s design. Its tweeter is a 28mm ceramic-coated aluminium dome, the same as used in the company’s high-end ES-14N model (£3750 / $4700 / AU$7495), and unusually does without ferrofluid for improved dynamic performance. Below 2kHz, a front-ported 13cm mica-loaded polypropylene mid/bass unit takes over. As the cone is injection-moulded, Epos has a great deal of freedom to optimise the profile and thickness to get precisely the response required. In addition, the mid/bass has a double-magnet motor (to control stray fields and increase the force on the voice coil), a low-loss rubber cone surround and a high-temperature Nomex spider.

Epos ES-7N tech specs

Epos ES-7N standmount speakers

(Image credit: What Hi-Fi?)

Type Standmounts 

Drive units 28mm ceramic-coated aluminium dome tweeter, 13cm loaded polypropylene mid/bass

Ported? Yes (front)

Bi-wire? No

Impedance 4 ohms

Sensitivity 86/89 dB/W/m

Dimensions (hwd) 29 x 20 x 27cm

Weight 7.6kg

Finishes x 4 (orange satin, walnut, white satin, black satin) 

The Epos’s 29cm tall cabinet is nicely made. Its panels are made of two layers of 8mm thick MDF separated by a high-loss damping material. There is an additional reinforcement in the form of a wooden block added to the top panel and a brace to help rigidity. At the base, you can screw in a quartet of small rubber feet, which provide decoupling when the speakers are used in a bookshelf or on top of conventional furniture. The ES-7N is available in four finishes (orange, black, white satin and walnut), and looks neat in all of them, but not particularly luxurious to our eyes.

We try the speakers on dedicated stands around 40cm from the rear wall and inside and on bookshelves, and can report that they sound best when used out into the room in a conventional position. That’s no surprise, of course, but it is interesting just how close to that optimum the Epos get when used elsewhere. There is a small loss in overall clarity and precision, while stereo imaging isn’t as expansive, but in most ways, we enjoy the result almost as much. It is obvious that a great deal of thought has gone into how to make the speakers so flexible over placement, and equally clear that the company has succeeded.

Sound

Epos ES-7N standmount speakers close up on tweeter

(Image credit: What Hi-Fi?)

These are relatively small speakers and so can’t compete with larger designs such as KEF’s three-way R3 Meta when it comes to bass weight, overall scale and dynamic reach. Yet, they do so much well that we don’t really mind the losses. The ES-7N are bold and confident performers that resolve high levels of detail and organise it in a cohesive and musical way. Play Kendrick Lamar’s Not Like Us and the Epos kick like a mule. They sound taut and punchy with music such as this, delivering the song’s jumpy rhythm track in a wonderfully surefooted manner. There is plenty of drive here and the speakers are great at conveying the music’s varying momentum. Lamar’s voice cuts through with clarity, every word of his passionate delivery is easy to follow.

Considering that these are small speakers with a modestly-sized 13cm mid/bass unit, it is surprising just how solid and full-bodied they sound at low frequencies. They may not dig as deeply as their KEF rival, but they do sound more controlled and grippy. Comparison with the similarly priced and sized Neat Petite Classic is interesting. We are big fans of the Neat’s musical and rhythmic presentation but the ES-7N are good enough to make them sound a little blurred and soft with it.

Switching to Micheal Giacchino’s It’s Raining Vengeance from The Batman OST, the Epos prove capable of delivering the music's broad dynamic sweeps and deeply oppressive feel superbly. The stereo imaging is expansive and precise, though some care needs to be taken over the toe-in angle to optimise things. KEF’s Uni-Q driver delivers a broader soundstage with a wider listening spot with less effort, but that is the main advantage of such a co-axial driver arrangement.

Epos ES-7N standmount speakers

(Image credit: What Hi-Fi?)

The Epos are supplied in mirror-imaged pairs and we experiment with the speakers positioned with the tweeters on the inside edge and then the outer. We prefer them as the company recommends, with the tweeters positioned on the inside. This configuration renders more solid and focused results.

Tonally, the ES-7N have a smooth, surprisingly full-bodied balance. While they are revealing of system and recording shortcomings they are refined enough never to make a meal of things. This means that they will produce good results with modest electronics, as our stint with Rotel’s budget A8 integrated proves, though if you want to hear the best from them, the starting point should really be something like Naim’s ND5 XS 2/Nait XS 3 streamer/amplifier combination at least. Move up to even more premium sources and amplification – we used our reference Naim ND555/555 PS DR music streamer/Burmester 088/911 MkIII amplifier – and the Epos shine even brighter. Make no mistake, there is plenty of sonic stretch in this design.

Verdict

Epos ES-7N standmount speakers

(Image credit: What Hi-Fi?)

Overall, the  Epos ES-7N are charmers. They are small, hugely capable and surprisingly unfussy in use. Pamper them with careful placement and a top-quality signal and they will deliver an excellent performance that’s good enough to challenge the very best alternatives at this level. However, even when the conditions aren’t optimised, they continue to excel. That’s a rare talent that should be celebrated. Highly recommended.

First reviewed: October 2024. Updated review: November 2024.

SCORES

  • Sound 5
  • Build 5
  • Compatibility 5

MORE:

Read our review of the Neat Petite Classic

Also consider the KEF R3 Meta

Read our ATC SCM 11 review

Best hi-fi speakers: budget to premium models tested by our expert reviewers

What Hi-Fi?

What Hi-Fi?, founded in 1976, is the world's leading independent guide to buying and owning hi-fi and home entertainment products. Our comprehensive tests help you buy the very best for your money, with our advice sections giving you step-by-step information on how to get even more from your music and movies. Everything is tested by our dedicated team of in-house reviewers in our custom-built test rooms in London, Reading and Bath. Our coveted five-star rating and Awards are recognised all over the world as the ultimate seal of approval, so you can buy with absolute confidence.

Read more about how we test

Read more
Dali Epikore 3 standmount speakers on white shelf with books behind
Dali Epikore 3
Epos ES-7N standmount speakers
Best bookshelf speakers 2025: top standmounts for every budget tested
Standmount speakers: Q Acoustics Concept 30
Q Acoustics Concept 30
Standmount speakers: Mission 700
Mission 700
Fyne Audio F501E floorstanding speakers
Fyne Audio F501E
ProAc D20R floorstanding speakers
ProAc D20R
Latest in Hi-Fi Speakers
Elac Debut 3.0 DB53 standmount speakers
Elac Debut 3.0 DB53
KEF LS50 Wireless II streaming speaker system on a desk next to the the Technics SC-CX700
4 things Technics needs to do to beat KEF’s LS50 Wireless II hi-fi system and one area where it’s better
Elipson Planet L Performance speakers
These Planet-shaped speakers promise "exceptionally pure sound" with an out-of-this-world design
Bowers & Wilkins Radiohead The Bends event
I heard my favourite Radiohead album on the B&W speakers used to record it – and now I love it even more
Dynaudio Confidence 20A
Dynaudio's Confidence 20A active speakers boast "the biggest upgrade in active hi-fi in over a decade"
Fyne Audio F501E floorstanding speakers
Fyne Audio ousts Q Acoustics as our new favourite sub-£1000 floorstanding speakers
Latest in Reviews
iFi Zen Phono 3 phono stage
iFi Zen Phono 3
Google TV Streamer video streamer
Google TV Streamer
Samsung QN990F on a white media unit with a grey curtain in the behind it and soundbar in front
Samsung QN990F 8K TV
Elac Debut 3.0 DB53 standmount speakers
Elac Debut 3.0 DB53
 iFi Zen DAC 3 digital-to-analogue converter
iFi Zen DAC 3
Sennheiser HD 505 open-back headphones
Sennheiser HD 505
  • Gray
    Wouldn't hurt to show what they look like with the grilles on, would it?
    And would magnetic grille fixing be too much to ask for at this price?

    No mention in the review of the fact that, unusually, they only take 4mm plugs - which is something those with bare wires need to know.

    But if they sound good, that's the main thing.
    Reply
  • mr_sneff
    I totally misread the price of these; I thought it was £189, which would be more in keeping with the styling. They look like budget boxes.
    Reply
  • Rui
    they do look good but the sensitivety today it seems a less interval on the frequency spectrum like in the past speakers had much more sensivety making them compatible with most of the amplifiers, like 100 to 110 DB´s,

    but i have them like this and are ok or perfect like the late 80´s Sixies from tannoy the 605 and 611 models

    , as more modern don´t have many speakers only three pairs since 1995 when i bought the cerwin-vega model who were the most power full ones ,the evolution of the AT-100,

    that were not that well talked about but for sure they sound good with any type of music or sound character played through them, also have the Wharfedale Linton, transpull 1500 from Magnat and some CDM 7 from B&W, the oldest from this 3 set´s i refered

    also from any source analogue or digital, like reels, records, cassettes , cd and dat cassettes, minidisc do sound good but not all types of sound seem that good with this digital format ,handy but not close to perfect as the DAT,

    I for sure will try to listen to them in a near future, as i was already thinking of buying the Elac speakers tested here and they sound really good
    Reply
  • Alp
    I've had these speakers for three weeks now and I am enjoying them so much, I am going to try to explain why.

    To address comments - they look and feel much more premium in person. In fact, I was surprised, they are very well built and inert. But they are not snazzy, in fact they are inspired by an East German speaker design from the 70s and I quite like that. Also, they come with adaptors for other type of connections but I'm not sure they'll work with bare wires.

    I can try to give you an idea of how they sound by comparing to other speakers I've had recently. But I am an amateur and I will do it relative to my room: having them close to the wall is a huge benefit for me. I had KEF LS50 (original and then Meta) on stands, but that was impractical with toddlers, so I got a pair of PMC Prodigy 1 placed ~20cm from the wall, not ideal. I use room correction and some room treatment. Amp is currently a Nuprime AMG-STA.

    Compared to the LS50 (from memory), they sound much more open and dynamic, even 'bigger', especially at low volume (~60 db at 1m). Soundstaging and separation is more precise and there is more depth. I love the upper midrange of the KEF but I never managed to make the bass sound clean and precise and not colour the low-mid, even with stands. These Epos sound much more natural and effortless, more transparent. The KEF do sound great but they need more space, a lot of current and volume. Even then, the bass on the Epos is cleaner and voices are better defined. Not really a contest IMO.

    Compared to the PMC (A/B), the midrange is definitely more forward and 'sweet' in the Epos. The PMCs feel leaner and faster, but a bit more hollow/flat and definitely I notice that room correction is needed to tame the treble, at least for me. I think the Epos' midrange is more tonally rich, but a touch warmer for sure so a matter of preference. Also, the treble feels like it's more focused and with a darker background, perhaps with even more detail but definitely with less attack than the PMC. I think the bass is very different. The Epos' is musical but not thumping, you rarely feel it in your chest - I auditioned a pair of ATC SCM 11 and they had a similar low end musicality. The PMCs are more fun in that regard, but notes felt less cohesive somehow (less precise?) and always trying to go boomy in my room, definitely cannot be placed as close to the walls as the Epos.
    In general, the PMCs extract a lot of detail and energy out of music (not a background speaker!), the Epos are inviting you in more. It may be the amp - I had an Arcam A15 with the PMC that was less forward but didn't have it for the Epos. I really like the PMCs, they are just so transparent with added fun - but I like studio monitors because I am used to them. 90% of my friends preferred the Epos. What convinced me to keep the Epos was imaging. They make it look easy, no faffing with placement, it just works. I prefer precise soundstage to very wide. I'd say it extends beyond the speakers but not as much as the PMC. But then you get more depth and amazing phantom imaging in some recording, it's almost spooky as it seems to come out of a very still background.

    Overall - I would say ignore them at your peril. If you can place speakers on stands, far from walls etc, you are lucky! And for that use, they may feel overpriced compared to PMCs or ATCs (or your favourite £1.5k speakers). But if you need them close to walls, or cannot position them perfectly, these are great. I think they are designed to actually work well in a normal room in a normal house or flat, not just in an optimal position at 90dB. That's very refreshing, I only wish there was more competition!
    Reply
  • Tessie
    Alp said:
    I've had these speakers for three weeks now and I am enjoying them so much, I am going to try to explain why.

    To address comments - they look and feel much more premium in person. In fact, I was surprised, they are very well built and inert. But they are not snazzy, in fact they are inspired by an East German speaker design from the 70s and I quite like that. Also, they come with adaptors for other type of connections but I'm not sure they'll work with bare wires.

    I can try to give you an idea of how they sound by comparing to other speakers I've had recently. But I am an amateur and I will do it relative to my room: having them close to the wall is a huge benefit for me. I had KEF LS50 (original and then Meta) on stands, but that was impractical with toddlers, so I got a pair of PMC Prodigy 1 placed ~20cm from the wall, not ideal. I use room correction and some room treatment. Amp is currently a Nuprime AMG-STA.

    Compared to the LS50 (from memory), they sound much more open and dynamic, even 'bigger', especially at low volume (~60 db at 1m). Soundstaging and separation is more precise and there is more depth. I love the upper midrange of the KEF but I never managed to make the bass sound clean and precise and not colour the low-mid, even with stands. These Epos sound much more natural and effortless, more transparent. The KEF do sound great but they need more space, a lot of current and volume. Even then, the bass on the Epos is cleaner and voices are better defined. Not really a contest IMO.

    Compared to the PMC (A/B), the midrange is definitely more forward and 'sweet' in the Epos. The PMCs feel leaner and faster, but a bit more hollow/flat and definitely I notice that room correction is needed to tame the treble, at least for me. I think the Epos' midrange is more tonally rich, but a touch warmer for sure so a matter of preference. Also, the treble feels like it's more focused and with a darker background, perhaps with even more detail but definitely with less attack than the PMC. I think the bass is very different. The Epos' is musical but not thumping, you rarely feel it in your chest - I auditioned a pair of ATC SCM 11 and they had a similar low end musicality. The PMCs are more fun in that regard, but notes felt less cohesive somehow (less precise?) and always trying to go boomy in my room, definitely cannot be placed as close to the walls as the Epos.
    In general, the PMCs extract a lot of detail and energy out of music (not a background speaker!), the Epos are inviting you in more. It may be the amp - I had an Arcam A15 with the PMC that was less forward but didn't have it for the Epos. I really like the PMCs, they are just so transparent with added fun - but I like studio monitors because I am used to them. 90% of my friends preferred the Epos. What convinced me to keep the Epos was imaging. They make it look easy, no faffing with placement, it just works. I prefer precise soundstage to very wide. I'd say it extends beyond the speakers but not as much as the PMC. But then you get more depth and amazing phantom imaging in some recording, it's almost spooky as it seems to come out of a very still background.

    Overall - I would say ignore them at your peril. If you can place speakers on stands, far from walls etc, you are lucky! And for that use, they may feel overpriced compared to PMCs or ATCs (or your favourite £1.5k speakers). But if you need them close to walls, or cannot position them perfectly, these are great. I think they are designed to actually work well in a normal room in a normal house or flat, not just in an optimal position at 90dB. That's very refreshing, I only wish there was more competition!
    Do you still have those wonderfull speakers?
    I like how they are made for putting close to the wall with the crossover filter switch on the back.
    Reply
  • Rui
    Alp said:
    I've had these speakers for three weeks now and I am enjoying them so much, I am going to try to explain why.

    To address comments - they look and feel much more premium in person. In fact, I was surprised, they are very well built and inert. But they are not snazzy, in fact they are inspired by an East German speaker design from the 70s and I quite like that. Also, they come with adaptors for other type of connections but I'm not sure they'll work with bare wires.

    I can try to give you an idea of how they sound by comparing to other speakers I've had recently. But I am an amateur and I will do it relative to my room: having them close to the wall is a huge benefit for me. I had KEF LS50 (original and then Meta) on stands, but that was impractical with toddlers, so I got a pair of PMC Prodigy 1 placed ~20cm from the wall, not ideal. I use room correction and some room treatment. Amp is currently a Nuprime AMG-STA.

    Compared to the LS50 (from memory), they sound much more open and dynamic, even 'bigger', especially at low volume (~60 db at 1m). Soundstaging and separation is more precise and there is more depth. I love the upper midrange of the KEF but I never managed to make the bass sound clean and precise and not colour the low-mid, even with stands. These Epos sound much more natural and effortless, more transparent. The KEF do sound great but they need more space, a lot of current and volume. Even then, the bass on the Epos is cleaner and voices are better defined. Not really a contest IMO.

    Compared to the PMC (A/B), the midrange is definitely more forward and 'sweet' in the Epos. The PMCs feel leaner and faster, but a bit more hollow/flat and definitely I notice that room correction is needed to tame the treble, at least for me. I think the Epos' midrange is more tonally rich, but a touch warmer for sure so a matter of preference. Also, the treble feels like it's more focused and with a darker background, perhaps with even more detail but definitely with less attack than the PMC. I think the bass is very different. The Epos' is musical but not thumping, you rarely feel it in your chest - I auditioned a pair of ATC SCM 11 and they had a similar low end musicality. The PMCs are more fun in that regard, but notes felt less cohesive somehow (less precise?) and always trying to go boomy in my room, definitely cannot be placed as close to the walls as the Epos.
    In general, the PMCs extract a lot of detail and energy out of music (not a background speaker!), the Epos are inviting you in more. It may be the amp - I had an Arcam A15 with the PMC that was less forward but didn't have it for the Epos. I really like the PMCs, they are just so transparent with added fun - but I like studio monitors because I am used to them. 90% of my friends preferred the Epos. What convinced me to keep the Epos was imaging. They make it look easy, no faffing with placement, it just works. I prefer precise soundstage to very wide. I'd say it extends beyond the speakers but not as much as the PMC. But then you get more depth and amazing phantom imaging in some recording, it's almost spooky as it seems to come out of a very still background.

    Overall - I would say ignore them at your peril. If you can place speakers on stands, far from walls etc, you are lucky! And for that use, they may feel overpriced compared to PMCs or ATCs (or your favourite £1.5k speakers). But if you need them close to walls, or cannot position them perfectly, these are great. I think they are designed to actually work well in a normal room in a normal house or flat, not just in an optimal position at 90dB. That's very refreshing, I only wish there was more competition!
    Yes, today 90DB seems a lot good but in the past those boxy speakers that were critised for two decades are still the better ones and from a time that all considered good were above 100DB´s ,

    but why new versions of the so bad boxy speakers cost a lot of money compared to others litle and powerfull said to be better but by looking at the specifications, if in the past no one would buy them,

    also the frequency response seems a lot more reduced in what concerns the far values in both ends of the sound spectrum, but there is a "but" ,when in late 80´s the Tannoy brand released the odly shaped "Sixies" i against all that i knew at the time bought some 605 not MK II as at the time all that was produced more due to excelent sold number of sppeakers ,

    in this situation would come worth built and worth sounding , as the Nakamichi Stasis amplifier was a great sounding amp. but the MKII or integrated amplifiers sold with Stasis range were not Stasis at all , as Nakamichi was sued in court by it´s creator ,the engenier that made the Stasis amplifier,

    as it pre-amplifier gave problems that made no sense , i used it with a Denon pre-amplifier and it worked for years wich is not a regular thing if made by Nakamichi,

    the well engeniered components that don´t last much because of it´s cheaply built materials, i kind of understand but see so many people world wide talk good about the Dragon cassette deck makes me wonder why is it so ,

    the worth headache i ever had and being young and not so well informed i even bought another as the turntable and cd player that had a sad end,

    and i had to try a much reliable brand that being used to it´s 70´s components , Pioneer was the solution that is still working today as in all components i bought from this brand, that wasn´t much refered in hi-fi magazines at the time,

    either than the horrible integrated amplifier A-400, at the time i thought "if it sounds really bad it´s because in reality is good" but also notice that most of the ones who bought this dull sounding built cheap amplifier next they spent more money than the amplifier cost in a GR-777 equalizer for home use,

    that is far from good equalizers but okay to do a litle touch in some sound that isn´t that good to us users at home.

    I in 89 after the nakamichi flop bought a A-91D integrated amplifier as i needed another for my living room,
    but never heard anyone talk about it and all that heard in my home this integrated amplifier, said that was perfect sounding,

    this using some cerwin-vega speakers from the same year also critised by many in hi-fi publications like "good to hear rock music " but i found them good to listen to any style of music and by it´s specifications either the amplifier or the speakers had to be good,

    it were better to hear 70´s or older records as in jazz , afro-beat , funk music, big bands(buddy rich) , raggae, tangio(Argentina),

    all that i played there sounded good even considered modern music at the time as a mix between sythesized sounds and organic ones as it is fashion to say today, as at the time some bands were being released by 4AD, had a superior quality in sound and the covers of the records were amazing good,

    some years ago a lot of people i know were wondering about a song they heard in a perfum comercial, the Tim Buckley song to a siren only singed by Eliazbeth frazer from Cocteau twins in a first e.p. of a project of musicians from this label(4AD) known by this Mortal Coil , now available in it´s first album not originally released with this song,

    had also a pair of infinity speakers but big ones with a high quality of sound, as i think all here know about infinity brand, or used to be known ,have to refer to the "Argonaut" Mission speakers, model 780 that i had bought a bit earlier and they sounded good to me,

    this having them conected to the nakamichi amplifier as i refer to earlier, as some earlier HPM-1100 from pioneer, that were left overs from my father´s buying´s ,

    as i could use what he had bought but not using it, that is also when i could start using his PLC-590 turntable from Pioneer series 20, after the Dragon Turntable stoped working correctelly,
    the only thing that i bought with my own money and having some doubts that dissipate with listening to it in a good and known hi-fi store ,

    the first Mission cyrus system with direct sound that the speakers still am using them the mission 761 , 70 watts at 4 ohms they sound amazing giving to the mission cyrus system a very good direct sound with what was a high quality integrated amplifier but English hi-fi equipment always surprised me for the better , again the later released 760i were not so good but enough good, as again Mission proved it´s high capability of manufacturing high qaulity sounding equipment.

    Japanese are good as refered by many but i think only because European brands that had very good equipment couldn´t face the costs of production of the japanese brands some having tried, surviving selling equipment built in japan or even equipment from a Japanese brands, re-branded with a European hi-fi brand
    Reply