Bush UT24SB (50UT24SB) review

How to get a lot for not a lot Tested at £270

Bush UT24SB 50-inch TV
(Image: © What Hi-Fi? / Netflix, Life On Our Planet)

What Hi-Fi? Verdict

The Bush 50UT24SB’s TiVo and Freely smarts prove a formidable combination – and they’re backed up by surprisingly competent picture quality

Pros

  • +

    Excellent two-tier smart features

  • +

    Good picture quality for the money

  • +

    Low input lag for gaming

Cons

  • -

    Very limited viewing angles

  • -

    Dark scenes look a little grey

  • -

    Pretty flimsy build quality

Why you can trust What Hi-Fi? Our expert team reviews products in dedicated test rooms, to help you make the best choice for your budget. Find out more about how we test.

It’s been a while since a Bush TV found its way onto our test benches. More than a decade, to be precise – which would usually be more than long enough to make us wonder if a brand had perhaps bitten the dust, even temporarily, at some point in the intervening period. Bush, though, has been tootling merrily along throughout the past decade with a succession of TVs targeted very much at the budget end of the market; it just hasn’t really done anything to catch our eye.

That’s changed, though, with the new Bush 50UT24SB, thanks to not one but two unexpected innovations. 

First, this TV is the first model launched in the UK to carry the new smart TV system from long-running (it celebrated its 25th birthday this year) independent media platform TiVo. Second, it’s also one of the first TVs to carry the UK’s new Freely platform, allowing you to live stream all BBC, ITV, Channel 4 and Channel 5 channels through the internet rather than having to watch them via an aerial or satellite dish. 

Let’s just hope it can also find some decent picture and sound quality to keep its ground-breaking smarts company.

Price

Bush UT24SB 50-inch TV

(Image credit: What Hi-Fi? / Netflix, Life On Our Planet)

Remarkably for a 50-inch 4K TV with not one but two interesting new smart features to its name, the Bush 50UT24SB costs just £270. It’s not completely unique at that price level; Roku’s influence on the TV world in particular has given birth to some remarkably cheap sets from TCL and Hisense, for instance. But if Bush can find a solid performance to go with its eye-catching features, the 50UT24SB could be a serious bargain.

The UK-only UT24SB range also includes 65-, 58-, 55- and 43-inch screen sizes, boasting similarly high-value prices of £380, £320, £300 and £230 respectively. 

Design

Bush UT24SB 50-inch TV side view showing rear of TV set

(Image credit: What Hi-Fi?)

Not surprisingly for such a value-focused TV, the Bush 50UT24SB isn’t particularly glamorous. Its screen is mounted within a pretty plain-Jane black frame that isn’t slim enough to stand out by today’s standards and still looks a little cheap and plasticky despite wearing a glossy finish. 

While fixing it to its pair of deep grey feet, meanwhile, we’re also struck by how lightweight it is, confirming that its build quality is basic at best.

Bush’s set sticks out more than most TVs around the back, too, although the rear panel does feature some surprisingly attractive sculpting should you happen to be weirdly fond of looking at the back of your TV rather than the front.

The 50UT24SB’s remote is as plasticky as the TV it controls. Its large, button-heavy design is pretty uninspired too; the sort of thing you might find on a cheap universal remote for the most part. The only highlight is the presence of dedicated Netflix, YouTube, Disney+, TikTok and Freely buttons.

Features

Bush UT24SB 50-inch TV on wooden table showing TiVo OS on screen

(Image credit: What Hi-Fi?)

Being able to get a 50-inch TV of any sort for £270 counts as a feature in itself. But that’s just the start of the Bush 50UT24SB’s attractions.

Its most interesting feature is the new TiVo OS. TiVo’s expertise when it comes to creating easy-to-use interfaces and enabling content management/discovery is the stuff of legend. Even its very first PVR back in 1999 benefited from a level of intelligence when it came to recommending TV shows and films based on your viewing habits and preferences that hadn’t been seen before, and this expertise has continued to evolve since then across various home-grown and licensed home entertainment products. The TiVo OS, though, represents the first time the brand has developed a full smart TV platform that can be licensed for use in pretty much any TV that wants it.

It doesn’t take long using TiVo OS to figure out that it’s an excellent addition to the smart TV scene. Its presentation is simple but effective in its organisation and, as hoped, it’s excellent at finding and recommending content that you actually might be interested in. The order and themes of its various ‘content shelves’ boast a logic and usefulness that can only come from decades of refinement and user research.

Bush UT24SB 50-inch tech specs

Bush UT24SB 50-inch TV

(Image credit: What Hi-Fi?)

Screen size 50 inches (also available in 43in, 55in, 58in, 65in)

Type LCD

Backlight Full array LED

Resolution 4K

HDR formats HLG, HDR10, Dolby Vision

Operating system TiVo

HDMI inputs x 3

Gaming features VRR, ALLM, Dolby Vision gaming

Input lag at 60Hz 10.2ms

ARC/eARC eARC

Optical output? Yes

Dimensions (hwd, without stand) 65 x 167 x 7.9cm

What’s more, even though the 50UT24SB is very much a budget TV, the TiVo OS runs slickly and bug-free throughout our time with it. This has the potential to make it a firm favourite with any TV brands looking for an operating system that’s able to deliver the goods within the limited processing power capabilities of their most affordable TVs. 

TiVo’s long industry experience and well-established relationships mean that TiVo OS is mostly a very content-rich smart system, too, with almost all of the main video streaming services present and correct. Including Freely, which, as with other implementations we’ve seen, delivers its fully streamed wares in surprisingly high picture quality with no glitching or buffering on our 250Mbps broadband connection. 

Freely’s own interface sits alongside TiVo OS perfectly happily. In fact, TiVo is able to delve surprisingly deeply into Freely’s system to bring out highlight content from Freely’s channels.

On top of all this, TiVo OS introduces a startlingly good voice recognition system that supports both more natural and procedural speech patterns than most rival smart TV audio systems, as well as carrying enough content knowledge to let you find films simply by dictating well-known quotes from them. 

All in all, the TiVo OS feels like a consistently friendly, helpful and slick interface that always seems to be enabling rather than hindering your viewing experience. You can’t really ask for more than that, especially on a TV as affordable as the 50UT24SB. Its only obvious weakness at the time of writing is that we can’t find any sign of the Apple TV app.

Bush UT24SB 50-inch TV showing connections at rear of set

(Image credit: What Hi-Fi?)

The 50UT24SB’s connections comprise three HDMIs, two USBs, an ethernet port, a Common Interface slot for the built-in tuner, and an optical digital audio output. The HDMIs support ALLM switching for games consoles and PCs, as well as, surprisingly, variable refresh rates. This VRR support only works up to the TV’s maximum 60Hz refresh rate, though; unsurprisingly, there’s no 120Hz gaming support.

In its Game preset the 50UT24SB gets the time it takes to render images down to an extremely respectable 10.2ms. There’s a Dolby Vision game setting, too, so that you can still enjoy responsive gaming in Dolby’s premium HDR format.

The Dolby Vision support extends to video sources as well as gaming, of course, and is accompanied by the more common HDR10 and HLG HDR formats. The Dolby connection extends, too, to Dolby Atmos sound playback – though it may only get limited value from this given that it only carries a 2 x 10W speaker system.

The 50UT24SB is built, finally, around a VA type of panel, and illuminated by LEDs placed directly behind the screen. This sort of set up typically delivers better contrast than TVs that use IPS panels and edge lighting. Not surprisingly for its money, though, there’s no Quantum Dot colour system or local dimming control.

Picture

Bush UT24SB 50-inch TV

(Image credit: What Hi-Fi? / Netflix, Life On Our Planet)

The Bush 50UT24SB’s pictures are better than you have any right to expect from a sub-£300 50-inch TV.

While dark scenes are always a particularly tough challenge for the budget TV world given their relative lack of light control features, for instance, the 50UT24SB handles them pretty well. The tell-tale pall of greyness that hangs over dark shots is mild enough to neither become a major distraction nor obscure subtle shading details. It’s also impressively consistent across the screen, rather than some parts of the screen looking cloudier than others. 

The 50UT24SB can adjust its light output in response to the image content you’re watching, and this is handled carefully enough to ensure it doesn’t cause any obvious brightness instability either within a dark sequence or during sharp cuts between light and dark shots.

All this means that dark scenes look as three-dimensional and generally credible as bright ones, enabling the 50UT24SB to maintain an immersive level of consistency with even quite dynamic HDR movies; that’s rarely found on a budget TV.

It probably helps the 50UT24SB’s dark scene performance that it’s not exactly the brightest HDR TV around. Neither full-screen daylight HDR shots nor peak HDR brightness highlights look truly, spectacularly HDR, as they can on a typical mid-range or premium TV these days. There is enough brightness with HDR, though, to deliver at least a visible step up in intensity and light range versus SDR images, and the management of the limited amount of light available is good enough to stop HDR images from looking artificially compressed or truly dull. Even the very brightest HDR points are handled without too much subtle detail being clipped out of them.

The 50UT24SB also handles colour better than most budget TVs. Its screen doesn’t make any extravagant wide colour gamut claims, but it still manages to produce richer tones in dark and bright scenes alike than we’d expected to see. There’s at least a little visible step up in saturations with HDR content over SDR, too, rather than HDR actually looking more washed out than SDR as can happen with TVs that try to deliver more brightness than their colour systems can sensibly sustain. 

The 50UT24SB’s limited brightness does limit the volume of colour the 50UT24SB can deliver, of course. Colours with HDR sources can look a touch coarse, too. But the set’s decent vibrancy and generally quite natural core tones mean colours still look typically more authentic and balanced than you will ordinarily find with such an affordable TV – especially when playing Dolby Vision sources in the set’s Dolby Vision Bright mode (the Dolby Vision Dark alternative takes too much brightness out of the picture for comfort, so is best avoided). 

The 50UT24SB’s slight lack of colour subtlety doesn’t stop native 4K pictures from enjoying plenty of sharpness and detail, either. Especially with game sources. You never feel in doubt that the 50UT24SB is a 4K TV, despite its fairly modest screen size.

There are a couple of other signs of the 50UT24SB’s budget nature that we need to report. The provided motion processing system delivers rather crude results and is typically best left switched off. Games that can’t hit a constant 60Hz refresh rate can look and feel a little awkward at times, even with VRR active. Upscaled HD pictures can look a touch coarse compared (unfairly) with more expensive TVs. Dark HDR scenes sometimes look a touch noisy – especially, oddly, in the otherwise strong Dolby Vision Bright picture mode. Plus, finally, the 50UT24SB’s viewing angles before contrast and colour fall away dramatically are extremely narrow. 

These sorts of things are more or less to be expected with such a cheap TV, though. Whereas the many things the 50UT24SB gets relatively right certainly aren’t.

Sound

Bush UT24SB 50-inch TV showing bottom/rear of set and feet

(Image credit: What Hi-Fi?)

The Bush 50UT24SB’s sound doesn’t impress against its budget peers as much as its pictures do. The main issue is a near total lack of bass, leaving loud, dense soundtrack moments sounding thin and short of impact. The bass shortage means high-pitched sounds can become over-dominant and harsh, too, while male voices can sound a little thick and constrained. The sound doesn’t project out of the TV with much conviction, either.

The speakers are sensitive enough to produce quite a bit of detail when they’re not overwhelmed by dense movie moments, though, and the harsh, brittle tone also only really becomes apparent at quite extreme moments. So the 50UT24SB’s sound is at least adequate for the majority of your viewing time – which is probably about fair enough for under £300.

Verdict

Bush UT24SB 50-inch TV slight angle on wooden dining table and white runner showing TiVo OS on screen

(Image credit: What Hi-Fi?)

While the Bush 50UT24SB is very much par for the budget TV course where its sound and build quality are concerned, its picture quality and, especially, smart features are more than good enough to make it not just cheap but a serious bargain.

SCORES

  • Picture 4
  • Sound 3
  • Features 4

MORE:

Read our review of the Amazon Omni 50-inch

Also consider the Samsung UE55CU8000

Best 50-inch TVs: the best mid-sized sets we've tested for every budget

Freelance contributor

John Archer has written about TVs, projectors and other AV gear for, terrifyingly, nearly 30 years. Having started out with a brief but fun stint at Amiga Action magazine and then another brief, rather less fun stint working for Hansard in the Houses Of Parliament, he finally got into writing about AV kit properly at What Video and Home Cinema Choice magazines, eventually becoming Deputy Editor at the latter, before going freelance. As a freelancer John has covered AV technology for just about every tech magazine and website going, including Forbes, T3, TechRadar and Trusted Reviews. When not testing AV gear, John can usually be found gaming far more than is healthy for a middle-aged man, or at the gym trying and failing to make up for the amount of time he spends staring at screens.

With contributions from
  • Sonicvcam
    What about reliability?
    Bush don't exactly have the best reputation for long term reliability. When you do reviews and recommendations you need to mention this.
    Reply
  • podknocker
    I wouldn't buy a Bush TV at £300 as it would probably go wrong very quickly. Saying that I paid £300 for a Sony TV several years ago and that broke within a year. I then paid £325 for a Toshiba panel and that developed a weird screen fault, again within 12 months. I don't think any brand is more reliable than another, for the same price. Good panels cost more and it also costs more to drive them properly with better and more expensive chips etc. It would be interesting to know if LG OLED panels last longer in LG TVs or the same panels in Sony OLED TVs.
    Reply
  • Sonicvcam
    podknocker said:
    I wouldn't buy a Bush TV at £300 as it would probably go wrong very quickly. Saying that I paid £300 for a Sony TV several years ago and that broke within a year. I then paid £325 for a Toshiba panel and that developed a weird screen fault, again within 12 months. I don't think any brand is more reliable than another, for the same price. Good panels cost more and it also costs more to drive them properly with better and more expensive chips etc. It would be interesting to know if LG OLED panels last longer in LG TVs or the same panels in Sony OLED TVs.
    Reply
  • Sonicvcam
    You do realise that Bush and Toshiba are both made by Vestel in Turkey so they are both as unreliable as each other!! JVC and most own brands are made by them to. Panasonic's budget TVs are made by Vestel too.

    Ive sold TVs for 29 years.
    Over that time Sony have consistently been the most reliable. Lg and Samsung are currently about the same but behind Sony.

    Unfortunately the race to make a TV as cheap had possible has reduced reliability massively. If you buy an mid to upper quality TV the reliability is pretty good then
    Reply
  • podknocker
    Sonicvcam said:
    You do realise that Bush and Toshiba are both made by Vestel in Turkey so they are both as unreliable as each other!! JVC and most own brands are made by them to. Panasonic's budget TVs are made by Vestel too.

    Ive sold TVs for 29 years.
    Over that time Sony have consistently been the most reliable. Lg and Samsung are currently about the same but behind Sony.

    Unfortunately the race to make a TV as cheap had possible has reduced reliability massively. If you buy an mid to upper quality TV the reliability is pretty good then
    I never knew Vestel in Turkey was the place these horrid things were made. Get them made in China! I have my eyes on the Sony A90K48 and it's still £1349 on most sites. You do get what you pay for.
    Reply
  • A_l_O
    Sonicvcam said:
    What about reliability?
    Bush don't exactly have the best reputation for long term reliability. When you do reviews and recommendations you need to mention this.

    How do you suggest they do that ?

    Reliability is something you can only measure over a period of time and they're testing brand new sets.

    Add in one set is not a statistically relevant sample - you'd need a sample rumning into the 000's to be statistically reliable.

    For the money, Vestel sets are pretty good in most respects. You have to remember you won't get a similarly specced Samsung or LG unless you pay 20% more and the cheapest Sony 50" is double the price.
    Reply
  • A_l_O
    podknocker said:
    I wouldn't buy a Bush TV at £300 as it would probably go wrong very quickly. Saying that I paid £300 for a Sony TV several years ago and that broke within a year. I then paid £325 for a Toshiba panel and that developed a weird screen fault, again within 12 months. I don't think any brand is more reliable than another, for the same price. Good panels cost more and it also costs more to drive them properly with better and more expensive chips etc. It would be interesting to know if LG OLED panels last longer in LG TVs or the same panels in Sony OLED TVs.
    You won't buy a Sony 50" for less than £600 at the moment - that's double the price.
    Reply
  • podknocker
    A_l_O said:
    You won't buy a Sony 50" for less than £600 at the moment - that's double the price.
    The only TV I'm looking at is the Sony A90K 48" at £1349 and I want it for £999 so I'm waiting.
    Reply
  • Sonicvcam
    A_l_O said:
    How do you suggest they do that ?

    Reliability is something you can only measure over a period of time and they're testing brand new sets.

    Add in one set is not a statistically relevant sample - you'd need a sample rumning into the 000's to be statistically reliable.

    For the money, Vestel sets are pretty good in most respects. You have to remember you won't get a similarly specced Samsung or LG unless you pay 20% more and the cheapest Sony 50" is double the price.
    I know it's difficult to do but when you get customers who come into your shop that have had 4 bush/Toshiba/JVC/supermarket TVs in 6 years that have all gone faulty or unusable after 18 or so months it doesn't represent good value for money. We get stories like this all the time. Look at trustpilot reviews!
    It makes the Samsung 50Du8000 at £419 with a 5 year warranty or the Sony 50x75 at £619 with a 5 year warranty very attractive plus the Sony is miles better. At least with both of these examples you are guaranteed for 5 years to have a TV.
    Why would you buy a TV these days with only a 12 month warranty?
    Reply
  • A_l_O
    Sonicvcam said:
    I know it's difficult to do but when you get customers who come into your shop that have had 4 bush/Toshiba/JVC/supermarket TVs in 6 years that have all gone faulty or unusable after 18 or so months it doesn't represent good value for money. We get stories like this all the time. Look at trustpilot reviews!
    It makes the Samsung 50Du8000 at £419 with a 5 year warranty or the Sony 50x75 at £619 with a 5 year warranty very attractive plus the Sony is miles better. At least with both of these examples you are guaranteed for 5 years to have a TV.
    Why would you buy a TV these days with only a 12 month warranty?

    Ah, the apocryphal tale of one customer who had 4 sets all of which failed in under 2 years.

    And you're saying these sets couldn't be repaired? Seriously? The most common failure is an LED backlight, a competent DIYer can do those - plenty of "how to" guides on line showing you how. For a "professional" it should be a 1 hour job tops.

    The reality is the Vestel sets massively outsell anything else on the market by volume, yet their reliability is only slightly worse than the top brands. If you want a 5 year warranty, buy from John Lewis who sell some Toshiba sets - but bear in mind price wise they tend to be higher than Currys or Argos for the same spec set.

    And if you buy a £200 TV which fails after 5 years use, chances are you'll just buy a new set.
    Reply