Spotify CEO says a "higher quality" Spotify is "in early days"... 1248 days since it was first announced

The Spotify logo in orange and yellow.
(Image credit: Spotify)

It currently feels like the Spotify team are on the longest prank ever, with bets on at HQ for how many times they can talk about the fact Spotify HiFi / Supremium / a high-res tier of Spotify's streaming service is coming, without it actually manifesting. 

Now, despite the fact it was officially announced more than three years ago (and first teased more than seven years ago), Spotify CEO Daniel Ek has described a higher quality Spotify as being "in early days". Yes, you read that right – early days.

The HiFi tier was once again discussed on an earnings call on Tuesday, in which the streaming giant announced it had surpassed expected subscriber numbers since the introduction of its Basic tier in June, and hit 246 million paying users. But as to when Spotify HiFi would appear, Ek was as vague as ever.

“The plan here is to offer much a much better version of Spotify,” said Ek on the call. “Think something like $5 above the current premium tier. So it’s probably around a $17 or $18 price point, but sort of a deluxe version of Spotify that has all of the benefits that the normal Spotify version has, but a lot more control, a lot higher quality across the board, and some other things that I’m not ready to talk about just yet.

"We’re quite excited about it, but it’s early days."

Is being "not ready to talk about" it Spotify's code for "we don't really know just yet?" It's starting to feel that way, though the pricing Ek mentions would line up with the recent Bloomberg story, which described a higher quality music-based "add on" for $5 more a month.

However, if Ek's vague comments are anything to go by, it seems like we might be waiting a little longer than we had originally thought.

MORE: 

Spotify HiFi: release date news, price prediction, quality, and latest rumours

Read our Spotify review

Do you agree? I love Tidal's high-quality audio, but I'm still going back to Spotify

Verity Burns

Verity is a freelance technology journalist and former Multimedia Editor at What Hi-Fi?. 

Having chalked up more than 15 years in the industry, she has covered the highs and lows across the breadth of consumer tech, sometimes travelling to the other side of the world to do so. With a specialism in audio and TV, however, it means she's managed to spend a lot of time watching films and listening to music in the name of "work".

You'll occasionally catch her on BBC Radio commenting on the latest tech news stories, and always find her in the living room, tweaking terrible TV settings at parties.

  • manicm
    It's a running joke, and I run to Tidal.

    Qobuz is a niche product in comparison, and not available in my country.
    Reply
  • podknocker
    The entire catalogue could be CD quality in few weeks. It's not a technical issue, they just don't think people actually want high quality music, but people do, that's why they are leaving Spotify and moving to Tidal. All Tidal is at least CD quality in FLAC and the same cost as Spotify.
    Reply
  • GSV Ethics Gradient
    If I cared about streaming quality I'd ditch them, but it's only for background listening.

    Either do it or don't - there must be as yet uncontacted tribes in the world's most remote regions who are bored by this...
    Reply