Sonos has accidentally sent customers extra speakers as "gifts"

Sonos has accidentally sent customers extra speakers as "gifts"
(Image credit: Sonos)

Something is amiss at Sonos towers. The company has been accidentally sending US customers more speakers than they ordered, and then charging them for them, The Verge reports. One customer bought one Sonos Move Bluetooth speaker, only to receive seven units, along with a bill for all of them.

But that customer might be in luck, as US law says unwanted extras can be kept as "gifts". Companies are also prohibited from charging customers for anything they didn't order.

The reports appeared on a Reddit thread. Sonos has since sought to reimburse customers once they return the unwanted speakers, although it is yet to offer any form of compensation for the inconvenience caused.

In an email to affected customers, the company blamed the issue on a system update that meant some orders were processed multiple times. It went on to ask customers to return their unwanted devices with a prepaid label using Sonos' couriers.

However, Sonos might be on shaky ground. The Federal Trade Commission in the US says that consumers are not legally obliged to return anything received from a company unsolicited.

The FTC states: "By law, companies can’t send unordered merchandise to you, then demand payment. That means you never have to pay for things you get but didn’t order. You also don’t have to return unordered merchandise. You’re legally entitled to keep it as a free gift."

So Sonos might be relying on the goodwill of affected customers if it wants to recoup any losses.

We've contacted Sonos for comment and will update this if we hear back.

MORE:

Check out these Sonos Roam tips, tricks and features

Read our guide to the best Bluetooth speakers

Find out Which Sonos speaker should you buy?

Joe Svetlik

Joe has been writing about tech for 20 years, first on staff at T3 magazine, then in a freelance capacity for Stuff, The Sunday Times Travel Magazine (now defunct), Men's Health, GQ, The Mirror, Trusted Reviews, TechRadar and many more. His specialities include all things mobile, headphones and speakers that he can't justifying spending money on.

Read more
Marantz Horizon sitting on a pile of rugs with a phone in front of it
I learned a hi-fi lesson testing Marantz's pricey wireless speaker: always look for a 'magic' button
Marantz Horizon sitting on a pile of rugs with a phone in front of it
I learned a hi-fi lesson testing Marantz's pricey wireless speaker: always look for a 'magic' button
Sonos Roam 2 wireless speaker
Sonos boss resigns following disastrous app redesign
Samsung HW-Q990D soundbar system
A software update is killing Samsung soundbars – including Q990D Dolby Atmos models
Sonos Era 300 placed next to the Audio Pro C20 on a desk
Best wireless speakers 2025: tried and tested by our expert team
A white Sonos Era 300 speaker on its stand next to a wooden countertop.
The best Sonos deals 2025: save big on speakers, soundbars and more
Latest in Wireless Speakers
HomePod OS
An Apple HomePod with a screen might arrive this year after all
JBL Flip 7 in white finish held in hand against backdrop of orange JBL beanie bags
JBL Flip 7 vs Flip 6: what's the difference between these two Bluetooth speakers?
JBL Charge 6 speaker held in hand
JBL Charge 6 vs Charge 5: what's new?
HomePod OS
The rumoured Apple HomePod with display is reportedly put on ice while Siri gets its act together
Bowers & Wilkins Zepellin
Bowers & Wilkins and McLaren are making new audio hardware with an F1 twist
JBL Charge 6 in red with carry strap
JBL upgrades two of our favourite Bluetooth speakers with bigger sound, longer battery life and more durable designs
Latest in News
Audiolab 6000A MkII amplifier in silver
Audiolab upgrades its five-star 6000A amplifier with a new DAC chip, enhanced circuitry and HDMI ARC
Qobuz
Qobuz reveals average payout per stream – and claims it is higher than rivals
Sonos Beam Gen 2
Quick! This five-star Sonos Dolby Atmos soundbar has dropped close to its lowest price
The Google Pixel 9a being held horizontally at waist-height so only the back is visible.
The Google Pixel 9a launches at £100 less than the iPhone 16e with a better screen
A woman flicking through stacks of vinyl records in a Rough Trade shop.
Vinyl records and music streaming both hit landmark highs – but the one growing faster in revenue may surprise you
Vertere DG X turntable in black finish
Vertere's gorgeous DG X turntable features significant updates for a more refined performance overall
  • no-name-123
    So these people are very aware that if an employer pays an Employee twice by mistake then the overpayment can very much legally recovered, so I fail to see a diference.

    I don't have details to hand but I believe a long time Zavvi made a similair mistake and sent lawyers after customers that tried to keep things sent by mistake that they had no intention of paying for, even though zavvi offered to cover the cost of return
    Reply
  • Kfitzat
    no-name-123 said:
    So these people are very aware that if an employer pays an Employee twice by mistake then the overpayment can very much legally recovered, so I fail to see a diference.

    I don't have details to hand but I believe a long time Zavvi made a similair mistake and sent lawyers after customers that tried to keep things sent by mistake that they had no intention of paying for, even though zavvi offered to cover the cost of return
    And what has a UK supplier got to do with something that happened in the US?
    Reply
  • S14brown
    I would have to think the vast majority of customers would return them. However, I wouldn't lift a finger to drag them down to Fedex. I would request call tags and have Fedex come get them.
    Reply
  • no-name-123
    S14brown said:
    I would have to think the vast majority of customers would return them. However, I wouldn't lift a finger to drag them down to Fedex. I would request call tags and have Fedex come get them.

    Without checking here and now, I believe that is what Sonos where offering which would be the right thing to do, because supose someone could not get to a fedex drop off for any reason
    Reply