Sonos has accidentally sent customers extra speakers as "gifts"

Sonos has accidentally sent customers extra speakers as "gifts"
(Image credit: Sonos)

Something is amiss at Sonos towers. The company has been accidentally sending US customers more speakers than they ordered, and then charging them for them, The Verge reports. One customer bought one Sonos Move Bluetooth speaker, only to receive seven units, along with a bill for all of them.

But that customer might be in luck, as US law says unwanted extras can be kept as "gifts". Companies are also prohibited from charging customers for anything they didn't order.

The reports appeared on a Reddit thread. Sonos has since sought to reimburse customers once they return the unwanted speakers, although it is yet to offer any form of compensation for the inconvenience caused.

In an email to affected customers, the company blamed the issue on a system update that meant some orders were processed multiple times. It went on to ask customers to return their unwanted devices with a prepaid label using Sonos' couriers.

However, Sonos might be on shaky ground. The Federal Trade Commission in the US says that consumers are not legally obliged to return anything received from a company unsolicited.

The FTC states: "By law, companies can’t send unordered merchandise to you, then demand payment. That means you never have to pay for things you get but didn’t order. You also don’t have to return unordered merchandise. You’re legally entitled to keep it as a free gift."

So Sonos might be relying on the goodwill of affected customers if it wants to recoup any losses.

We've contacted Sonos for comment and will update this if we hear back.

MORE:

Check out these Sonos Roam tips, tricks and features

Read our guide to the best Bluetooth speakers

Find out Which Sonos speaker should you buy?

Joe Svetlik

Joe has been writing about tech for 20 years, first on staff at T3 magazine, then in a freelance capacity for Stuff, The Sunday Times Travel Magazine (now defunct), Men's Health, GQ, The Mirror, Trusted Reviews, TechRadar and many more. His specialities include all things mobile, headphones and speakers that he can't justifying spending money on.

Latest in Wireless Speakers
Apple HomePod 2 vs Apple HomePod
The affordable iPhone 16e is all well and good, but where's my new HomePod, Apple?
Bowers & Wilkins Zeppelin Pro Edition wireless speaker
The B&W Zeppelin Pro Edition makes a glaring omission – but it doesn't detract from its five-star performance
Bowers & Wilkins Zeppelin Pro Edition wireless speaker
Bowers & Wilkins Zeppelin Pro Edition
Zeppelin Pro Edition vesus Zeppelin 2021 banner image
Bowers & Wilkins Zeppelin (2021) vs Bowers & Wilkins Zeppelin Pro: what are the differences?
LG XBoom Go XG8T wireless speaker on wooden garden bench
LG XBoom Go XG8T
Sony LinkBuds Speaker wireless speaker held in hand above lawn
Sony LinkBuds Speaker
Latest in News
Q Acoustics 3050i
Save £650 on this five-star Q Acoustics 5.1 home cinema setup
Marantz Cinema 30 AVR
Our Award-winning reference Marantz AVR is still selling at its best price ever
Meze Audio Poet
Meze's open-back Poet cans arrive, and they want to bring your music alive
Side view of Marantz CD6007 on wooden rack with magazines in background
This Award-winning Marantz CD player is back at its Black Friday price
Sonos Arc standing on a wooden unit beneath a TV screen
Stock of the Sonos Arc is starting to dry up – but there are still savings to be found on this Dolby Atmos soundbar
A woman relaxing in an armchair clasping a mug, gazing admiringly at a yellow turntable and speakers on a hi-fi cabinet.
Pro-Ject's new hi-fi system adds a splash of colour to your listening
  • no-name-123
    So these people are very aware that if an employer pays an Employee twice by mistake then the overpayment can very much legally recovered, so I fail to see a diference.

    I don't have details to hand but I believe a long time Zavvi made a similair mistake and sent lawyers after customers that tried to keep things sent by mistake that they had no intention of paying for, even though zavvi offered to cover the cost of return
    Reply
  • Kfitzat
    no-name-123 said:
    So these people are very aware that if an employer pays an Employee twice by mistake then the overpayment can very much legally recovered, so I fail to see a diference.

    I don't have details to hand but I believe a long time Zavvi made a similair mistake and sent lawyers after customers that tried to keep things sent by mistake that they had no intention of paying for, even though zavvi offered to cover the cost of return
    And what has a UK supplier got to do with something that happened in the US?
    Reply
  • S14brown
    I would have to think the vast majority of customers would return them. However, I wouldn't lift a finger to drag them down to Fedex. I would request call tags and have Fedex come get them.
    Reply
  • no-name-123
    S14brown said:
    I would have to think the vast majority of customers would return them. However, I wouldn't lift a finger to drag them down to Fedex. I would request call tags and have Fedex come get them.

    Without checking here and now, I believe that is what Sonos where offering which would be the right thing to do, because supose someone could not get to a fedex drop off for any reason
    Reply