I've heard over 150 products this year, and these are my 5 hi-fi highlights

I've heard roughly 150 products this year, and these are my 5 hi-fi highlights
(Image credit: Future)

Over the last year, I must have seen and heard probably close to a couple of hundred products as they have passed through What Hi-Fi?'s suite of test rooms. Some — surprisingly few, actually — have been downright poor, most have been what I'd call 'solid', and a select few have impressed enough to win one of our 2023 What Hi-Fi? Awards.

But this list isn't simply my favourite handful of those Award winners; it is my pick of the products that have personally made an impact on me, that goes beyond star ratings and awards. I find these products interesting and, each in their own way, unusual...

TEAC VRDS-701 CD player

Given that the launch of new CD players has slowed to a mere trickle, the law of probability suggests that the chances of any making it onto this list are minuscule. So it says much for the quality of the TEAC VRDS-701 (pictured top) that it gets the nod.

This is a well-conceived product that not only plays CDs to a high level but also has the full range of digital inputs to allow it to work as an outboard DAC for other digital sources. The internal DAC’s range of compatibility is impressive, going up to 32-bit/384kHz PCM and DSD 512. There is a great deal of adjustability on offer, too, allowing tweakers to fine-tune the player's performance to their tastes. But quite honestly, such is the standard of the performance, I think most people will have a play before sticking to the same settings from then on.

This is a well-built unit, giving off the impression of something designed to serve for decades. The heart of the machine is, of course, TEAC’s highly-respected VRDS transport mechanism, which supports the disc over its entire surface in a bid to reduce rotational vibration. My experience of the ‘701, and other premium VRDS-equipped TEAC CD players in the past, strongly suggests there is plenty of merit to that idea. 

This player delivers a wonderfully stable and authoritative sound that even a machine as talented as Cyrus’s CDi-XR struggles to match. Bass is delivered with texture, depth and power, and serves as a solid foundation for the rest of the frequency range to build on. Regarding detail resolution, control and muscularity, this CD player has nothing to fear from any rival we’ve come across. That it is a pleasure to use is a bonus.

Musical Fidelity A1 integrated amplifier

Musical Fidelity A1 amplifier with remote on white background

(Image credit: What Hi-Fi?)

I admit I’ve always had a soft spot for the iconic Musical Fidelity A1, what with its distinctive angular design and the exotic nature of its Class A circuitry. So when the company decided to resurrect the '80s design, I couldn't wait to hear the results. Fortunately, the new A1 didn’t disappoint. 

It's intended to be a faithful reincarnation of the 1985 original – and within current legislation, it mostly is. Where the company has erred, it has done so for good reason. The new version’s case is bigger to help heat dissipation, while inside is a revised power supply arrangement to improve sound quality. There is also a remote, something the original lacked.

Despite all the hard work, there is no way to avoid the fact that the new model still runs hot – indeed, hot enough to feel uncomfortable to touch for more than a few seconds. Excess heat is part and parcel of a Class A circuit design, of course, but so is the promise of good sound – and that’s what the new A1 delivers.

It sounds way bolder than its modest 25-watt-per-channel power output suggests. The character of the presentation is wonderfully full-bodied, smooth and fluid, leaving most of its competition sounding a little sterile and mechanical in comparison. The 2023 A1 may not be the most detailed or transparent amplifier in its class, but it remains one of the most beguiling.

Fyne Audio Vintage Classic X loudspeakers

Fyne Audio Vintage Classic X next to a plant

(Image credit: What Hi-Fi?)

It is easy to underestimate a speaker like the Fyne Audio Vintage Classic X. I suspect most people tempted by them will predominantly buy them for the way they look, and there’s nothing wrong with that. 

They are beautifully made and will blend into a traditional-styled domestic space seamlessly. But that isn’t why these speakers are on my list. No, they're here purely because of their sound and, to a certain degree, their price. Quite simply, this is a lot of speaker for the money, both physically and sonically. Yes, even at £6499 ($11,000 / AU$16,995). 

Little else I’ve heard in the last year sounds like them. That huge 25cm Isoflare driver array, which places the titanium dome compression tweeter in the throat of the paper-fibre mid/bass, delivers a combination of free-flowing dynamics, low-end agility and musical cohesiveness that’s hard to get any other way at this price level.

Sure, the Classic X wouldn’t be my first choice if tonal neutrality or treble refinement were my main priorities, but in most other ways they do sound truly lovely.

Rega Naia turntable

The Naia turntable sat next to a Rega amplifier

(Image credit: Rega)

The Naia was the Rega deck I didn’t think would be made. It is effectively a production version of the company’s famous Naiad, a technological showpiece and 'test bed' concept that was intended to push Rega's engineering principles as far as possible, irrespective of cost.

The brand reckons that the Naia pretty much matches the Naiad's performance, which is an impressive achievement for something that can be built on a production line next to the company's bread-and-butter Planar decks.

The highlights here are the exceptionally light yet rigid carbon fibre-reinforced foam plinth, the ceramic platter/main bearing assembly, and the Titanium tonearm. 

The result is one of the finest record players I have heard, period. The Naia sounds exquisitely transparent for the most part, able to resolve so much in terms of detail but deliver it in such a natural and unforced manner that most of the competition sounds contrived in comparison. I was particularly taken by the Naia's articulate and textured way with bass, which initially sounded a little lightweight to me but over time proved unusually agile and honest.

Lavardin ITx integrated amplifier

Orange Lavardin ITx on a white background

(Image credit: Future)

Cards on the table, I love this amplifier. On the surface, spending over £7000/$9000 on a functional-looking stereo amp that offers just 55 watts per channel doesn’t seem sensible, does it? Particularly when that amount of money will buy a thick slice of sophistication, hundreds of watts of power and an exceptional build quality from any of the established high-end alternatives. Indeed, that Lavardin feels it is wise to charge extra for a remote is hard to understand.

Yet, the Lavardin ITx is special. The core philosophy behind the company's amplifiers has always been the eradication of what it calls ‘Memory Distortion’. This is the idea that as electrons flow across silicon (used in transistors) they leave a residual path, and that path affects the way that subsequent electrons move through the material. Lavardin claims that this effect causes traditional transistor-based designs to sound harder and less musical than valve-powered alternatives. In valves, electrons (essentially) flow through a vacuum so the ‘Memory Distortion’ effect doesn’t exist.

At this point, I must mention that no other manufacturer I know of even acknowledges the effect, let alone thinks it's a problem that needs solving. But, given how good the iTx and other Lavardin amplifiers I’ve heard sound, I’m willing to give the company the benefit of the doubt.

This Lavardin is one of the most uncluttered and musically cohesive amplifiers I’ve heard, irrespective of price. Its presentation is wonderfully smooth and fluid. In those respects, it does remind me of some of the better valve designs on the market. But here, they are combined with a combination of agility, dynamic subtlety and rhythmic drive that is beyond any of its natural competitors, regardless of design. Sometimes the most precious of gifts can come in the plainest of wrappers. That's certainly the case here.

MORE:

Christmas Gift Guide 2023: the best gift ideas for music, film and tech fans

CES 2024 preview: the news and rumours ahead of January's electronics show

New issue of What Hi-Fi? out now: the best stereo speakers you can buy

Ketan Bharadia
Technical Editor

Ketan Bharadia is the Technical Editor of What Hi-Fi? He's been been reviewing hi-fi, TV and home cinema equipment for over two decades, and over that time has covered thousands of products. Ketan works across the What Hi-Fi? brand including the website and magazine. His background is based in electronic and mechanical engineering.

  • Combat
    So in other words, while many other review sites and publications look forward to the future, What HiFi are stuck firmly in the past?
    Reply
  • podknocker
    Combat said:
    So in other words, while many other review sites and publications look forward to the future, What HiFi are stuck firmly in the past?
    I get this feeling most of the time. It still amuses/confuses me why we have a vinyl revival, never mind the CD player, now into its 5th decade of production. At least CD sounds great and there's no faffing around. I still own 250 CDs, but not played one for yonks. Double clicking on any of the 80 million Spotify tracks and podcasts is so much easier. At some point, surely, someone will wake up and say 'OMG these LPs are ancient and are so much faff and don't sound as good as newer formats'. I'm still waiting!!! Then there's a new speaker, designed to look like one from the 60s.

    https://www.whathifi.com/reviews/fyne-audio-vintage-classic-x
    'Large size may be an issue for some'

    Really?
    Reply
  • SteveR750
    I'd really like to see the validated research that demonstrates electron path memory in a doped silicon semiconductor device, and how that "hardens" the sound. Might be useful to perhaps first quantify what they mean by harden.
    Reply
  • Rui
    podknocker said:
    I get this feeling most of the time. It still amuses/confuses me why we have a vinyl revival, never mind the CD player, now into its 5th decade of production. At least CD sounds great and there's no faffing around. I still own 250 CDs, but not played one for yonks. Double clicking on any of the 80 million Spotify tracks and podcasts is so much easier. At some point, surely, someone will wake up and say 'OMG these LPs are ancient and are so much faff and don't sound as good as newer formats'. I'm still waiting!!! Then there's a new speaker, designed to look like one from the 60s.

    https://www.whathifi.com/reviews/fyne-audio-vintage-classic-x
    'Large size may be an issue for some'

    Really?
    If you started to listen to music in late 60´s and by 1974 you had a good sounding system, how would you judge the compact disc sound, even the last edition of some 70´s lp´s not even played in the best cd players of the world aproaches to the sound of old records ,

    maybe why young generations don´t like that much 70´s or 80´s or even 90´s bands because the sound of the compact disc is steril, instruments don´t sound like instruments ,don´t get me wrong i do like a lot digital sound but not from the poor 70´s compacted sound ,there was a evolution in digital ,i have more than 5.000 cds bought after 93 ,

    it´s only a pitty that i bought some of my favorite albuns in cd ,but they sound so bad that i heard them some seconds of each track knowing them to 100% of their sound i couldn´t heard the cd version, in the 80´s a thing called DAT was released ,it was the best and why insist in the cd format ,

    someone is making a lot of many to continue to use this frail steril and bad sounding source and spotify is fine ,one arrives home tired of the entire day working for others and one can seat on a couch and only by putting on the amplifier listen to whatever one wants with a laptop as an example but in sound quality never saw better than a analogue source,

    i have good components, well i colect them since late 50´s till today and i can add that turntables sold as an example by pro-ject for prices till 2.000€ sound like pure garbage,i have turntables that if sold today they would cost maybe 20.000€ and others much cheaper but with original cartridge and stylus from early 70´s or late 60´s and when you play a record it feels like the band is playing close to you ,

    so new hi-fi gear is expensive and no quality at all, my cd player that i didn´t pay for it is considered very good and it´s belt-driven but i have other 50 to 70 cd players that all are very good, i can even tell you that i bought a live record in 1990 because the cd that had more tracks was doble the price ,the album when played at home i was like, this is the best live recorded album with only bass,two six string guitar and drums, also voice and in the back said "directelly recorded into DAT"

    later i had more money and bought the cd ,well i only playd it for a bit and it´s in the same place since i bought it ,so recorded digitally not using one of my best turntables sounds amazing ,maybe the best live recording with the instruments i refer, but it´s cd version sound like garbage .

    To resume i don´t mind using either digital or analogue but like to hear music with good sound so the only option are records or vinyl or wax ,i think they had enough time to create a new improved format if it sounds so good and nowhere to be found,

    i only can say ,the 70´s were long ago, so call cd a modern format ,

    there are very good turntables sold after 1979, allthough today vinyl and turntables is a deal to steal money from the people,

    while evolution is forgoten and stealing from the people is the main goal ,it´s one of the oldest actions in human kind as a species, to steal from others,

    but if you only heard cds you don´t realize how bad it sounds and how good records sounded in the 70´s, not comparable with cd sound today, for it´s steril sound and not as recorded in a studio, so direct sound with a cd ,ahahahahah!!!that was another joke passed into people, in the 80´s, some even believed it

    Really, still think cds are very good ?
    Reply
  • podknocker
    I'm 54 and I've been listening to CDs for nearly 40 years and to me they sound superb. I have a decent system and really enjoy the sound, although I do stream most of my music now, at a lower quality. CD has perfect pitch stability, amazing S/N ratio and dynamic range. There are higher res formats, but I don't think they are necessary unless you have a really good amp and speakers to allow the resolution to be realised. If the mastering process is given the same care and attention as with LPs, then CD is able to capture and reproduce a very close approximation to the studio recording. LPs cannot resolve this and that's why many prefer the sound of vinyl as it will flatter a poor recording, due to the lower resolution. CDs have higher resolution, so will reveal and limitations of the recording equipment. I prefer the warts and all presentation of CDs, although I tend to listen to CDs where the recording AND mastering techniques are as high quality as they can be. My favourite album is the first Dire Straits album, released in 1978 and it is a quality recording. The effort and care in the recording really shines through on CD and there is no chance any domestic playback format in 1978 would have come anywhere near the sound of this album on CD. You would have had poor quality record players and AM radio. It's taken the invention of CD and new formats to realise the quality, or lack of quality, in older recordings.
    Reply
  • Rui
    Rui said:
    If you started to listen to music in late 60´s and by 1974 you had a good sounding system, how would you judge the compact disc sound, even the last edition of some 70´s lp´s not even played in the best cd players of the world aproaches to the sound of old records ,

    maybe why young generations don´t like that much 70´s or 80´s or even 90´s bands because the sound of the compact disc is steril, instruments don´t sound like instruments ,don´t get me wrong i do like a lot digital sound but not from the poor 70´s compacted sound ,there was a evolution in digital ,i have more than 5.000 cds bought after 93 ,

    it´s only a pitty that i bought some of my favorite albuns in cd ,but they sound so bad that i heard them some seconds of each track knowing them to 100% of their sound i couldn´t heard the cd version, in the 80´s a thing called DAT was released ,it was the best and why insist in the cd format ,

    someone is making a lot of many to continue to use this frail steril and bad sounding source and spotify is fine ,one arrives home tired of the entire day working for others and one can seat on a couch and only by putting on the amplifier listen to whatever one wants with a laptop as an example but in sound quality never saw better than a analogue source,

    i have good components, well i colect them since late 50´s till today and i can add that turntables sold as an example by pro-ject for prices till 2.000€ sound like pure garbage,i have turntables that if sold today they would cost maybe 20.000€ and others much cheaper but with original cartridge and stylus from early 70´s or late 60´s and when you play a record it feels like the band is playing close to you ,

    so new hi-fi gear is expensive and no quality at all, my cd player that i didn´t pay for it is considered very good and it´s belt-driven but i have other 50 to 70 cd players that all are very good, i can even tell you that i bought a live record in 1990 because the cd that had more tracks was doble the price ,the album when played at home i was like, this is the best live recorded album with only bass,two six string guitar and drums, also voice and in the back said "directelly recorded into DAT"

    later i had more money and bought the cd ,well i only playd it for a bit and it´s in the same place since i bought it ,so recorded digitally not using one of my best turntables sounds amazing ,maybe the best live recording with the instruments i refer, but it´s cd version sound like garbage .

    To resume i don´t mind using either digital or analogue but like to hear music with good sound so the only option are records or vinyl or wax ,i think they had enough time to create a new improved format if it sounds so good and nowhere to be found,

    i only can say ,the 70´s were long ago, so call cd a modern format ,

    there are very good turntables sold after 1979, allthough today vinyl and turntables is a deal to steal money from the people,

    while evolution is forgoten and stealing from the people is the main goal ,it´s one of the oldest actions in human kind as a species, to steal from others,

    but if you only heard cds you don´t realize how bad it sounds and how good records sounded in the 70´s, not comparable with cd sound today, for it´s steril sound and not as recorded in a studio, so direct sound with a cd ,ahahahahah!!!that was another joke passed into people, in the 80´s, some even believed it

    Really, still think cds are very good ?
    Because i listen to the first cd when released and listen to many more through out the years and could compare them with we what was being used to listen to music at the time,

    and follow it´s evolution (almost none ,just a decrease in building quality ,when in the 90´s, to make them afordable to all people , a cd would cost the same as two records(vinyl) and enough money to go out and drink some beers with friends ,

    i might had only 7 cds but i was friend with the only music , musical instruments and hi-fi gear store owner in the city where i live ,that started to sell them when they were available and by that time most of the people was using their 70´s systems and records were the most sold, i would repeat myself saying that i use to buy records on a imported records store only and even for less money i would buy records ordering them from gemma records in the U.K. they would come out 6 monthes before released in Portugal , as an example only when Back in Black was released for the first time, all AC/DC albums were available on portuguese music stores.

    that is related by the dictatorship that existed in Portugal and most of the bands were censored ,so only after 1974 they started to be released in Portuguese music stores, but you could also buy them abroad when travelling, in Spain there was also a dictatorship but there most of the bands were released, only 40km´s from the city where i was born and lived(taking some years when i was living in other continents or European countries

    ,so you think that in more than 40 years digital was so good but not evolved since the 70´s, what about other digital format several times better sounding than the cd in the 80´s to the point of being compared with the reel to reel decks,

    what are the album´s you think i´m wrong when saying they were destroyd when converted to digital? I would like to know you´re opinion in tracks levels and regarding instruments sound as in several tracks per channel,

    what abot studios did you listen to music on diferent labels recording studios ,so you can say it´s not true that the sound of a cd is not even 50% of the sound quality heard in a studio, i would say 0% buit let´s not get carried away, the bass was amlost all heard and the kick of the drums, i don´t receive money to say that analog recordins sound better in vinyl than in cd.

    That i know of, every recording till late 90´s sound bad in cd ,more related with rock albums or bands that play guitars, drums, electronic keyboards and voice but there are a few exceptions, but only a few, i think i know what i´m talking about having a studio built at home by my father and evolved through the years , i know how sound is captured and recorded
    Reply
  • Rui
    podknocker said:
    I'm 54 and I've been listening to CDs for nearly 40 years and to me they sound superb. I have a decent system and really enjoy the sound, although I do stream most of my music now, at a lower quality. CD has perfect pitch stability, amazing S/N ratio and dynamic range. There are higher res formats, but I don't think they are necessary unless you have a really good amp and speakers to allow the resolution to be realised. If the mastering process is given the same care and attention as with LPs, then CD is able to capture and reproduce a very close approximation to the studio recording. LPs cannot resolve this and that's why many prefer the sound of vinyl as it will flatter a poor recording, due to the lower resolution. CDs have higher resolution, so will reveal and limitations of the recording equipment. I prefer the warts and all presentation of CDs, although I tend to listen to CDs where the recording AND mastering techniques are as high quality as they can be. My favourite album is the first Dire Straits album, released in 1978 and it is a quality recording. The effort and care in the recording really shines through on CD and there is no chance any domestic playback format in 1978 would have come anywhere near the sound of this album on CD. You would have had poor quality record players and AM radio. It's taken the invention of CD and new formats to realise the quality, or lack of quality, in older recordings.
    That is a good example but i think it really sounds better in record or vinyl but ican say that is a good example of not loosing their identity when passed on to a compact disc,

    but if putted to play at the same time one notices the higher dynamics on vinyl , and as an example i could refer the crime of the century by Supertramp which is the only album i like from this band, and recentelly bought the cd and notice the missing sounds that were on the original vinyl release ,

    but today all new record players and cartridges are too expensive and till 2.000€ have no quality at all ,

    so some might think that´s how people listened to music in the past but old amplifiers ,turntables and speakers had a much more filled sound compared to modern systems and releases of badly fabricated vinyl records and LP´s there are on cd and vinyl.

    To end i would like to refer to U2 , i bought their first album after seeing them live after the release of the second album and when buying cds i bought the albums till joshua tree in cd ,

    somehow they never sounded good to me as the LP´s in vinyl , what could get by changing the tone controls on a 74 system i could never emulate in a 90´s high-end system,

    not even using a good equalizer, i could hear the sound of the vinyl LP on the cd and i did had a real good cd player compared to the turntable i was using at the time but enough to not buy a new turntable,

    having tried a lot of them in early 90´s, only later i bought a good thorens turntable that could improve the sound of the 74 turntable i was using ,i had better turntables but i wanted something new,

    as i was tired of brushed aluminium that was almost every hi-fi component i had since started to listen to music, and i also colected them, at the time i had mainly European brands systems or components , they were disapearing so i bought everything i could get from a german militar family´s living in a neighborhood inside the city i live.

    The only reason why i was using the 74 pioneer turntable was just because i had installed new belts and had bought a new stylus and was enough good(mainly made of wood and metal with some keys in baquelite) looking to assemble it in my 90´s new system, in black with mohogany side panels,
    Reply
  • Rui
    podknocker said:
    I get this feeling most of the time. It still amuses/confuses me why we have a vinyl revival, never mind the CD player, now into its 5th decade of production. At least CD sounds great and there's no faffing around. I still own 250 CDs, but not played one for yonks. Double clicking on any of the 80 million Spotify tracks and podcasts is so much easier. At some point, surely, someone will wake up and say 'OMG these LPs are ancient and are so much faff and don't sound as good as newer formats'. I'm still waiting!!! Then there's a new speaker, designed to look like one from the 60s.

    https://www.whathifi.com/reviews/fyne-audio-vintage-classic-x
    'Large size may be an issue for some'

    Really?
    60´s?i´ve seen them talking about klipsch from the 40´s ,re-released model, size doesn´t matter but quality as most of the things in our world.

    Quality is not the best of what is talked about but a new definition imposed, like in european comunity quality level for essential food products, i had around 10 trees of the best fruit produced in my region that makes me laugh when buying ,in this case fruit .

    In the first ten years i didn´t eat any prior to being used to consume the best ,can´t say quality but the best it can be produced having or not influence on the profit (shouldn´t matter)

    like strawberries ,i think people in their early 40´s don´t know that strawberries are sweet not green as they are sold today,

    this if not having in their backyard a litle fruit production ,but depends on regions where this fruit is developed better, not it´s best quality redefined by european union to be sold in super-markets,

    i think the same is happeneing with all we consume
    Reply
  • koshka
    The 1970s - dreadful recycled vinyl because of the oil crisis and the Shure V15 - it wasn't all wonderful - Taking records back because they were warped or jumped was common. It took a lot of effort to get a decent LP. Modern LP's aren't up to much either because of the digital processing but at least less pressing faults and the 180gm LP have made it less of a battle.
    Reply
  • SidSilver
    SteveR750 said:
    I'd really like to see the validated research that demonstrates electron path memory in a doped silicon semiconductor device, and how that "hardens" the sound. Might be useful to perhaps first quantify what they mean by harden.
    I get what you're saying, but that might be hugely expensive, or at least need expensive equipment like an electron microscope. And hopefully the EM is not affected by current passing through the transistor.
    Reply