I learned a depressing stat this week: HDR accounts for only around 5% of TV viewing

The 65-inch Philips OLED809 TV photographed on a wooden TV stand with an image of wilderbeest crossing a crocodile-infested river on the screen
(Image credit: Future)

What Hi-Fi? Towers recently had a visit from Danny Tack, the TV industry legend behind Philips TVs. It's probably fair to say that he's obsessed with upscaling low-resolution video to 4K quality and with upconverting SDR to HDR, and during this visit, I got a hint at why: very few people are watching proper HDR content on Philips TVs.

I'm not naive enough to think that HDR makes up most TV viewing, but Tack made it sound like the numbers are tiny, so I asked if he would share them with me. He did just that this week, and I'm genuinely shocked and dismayed by them.

According to Tack, "In our High-End range – effectively OLED and Mini LED – [viewing] fluctuates between 4 and 8% for HDR. The rest is SDR. In the [TV] range below (the core range, say for instance The One LCD range) it is less than 1% for HDR."

Let that sink in for a moment: most people who are spending big money on top-of-the-range OLED and Mini LED TVs are using them to watch an absolutely tiny amount of HDR content. Owners of more entry-level models, which are perfectly capable of handling HDR, are watching only a fraction of that tiny number.

That's just baffling to me. I realise there are plenty of people who just don't really care about picture quality and simply buy a TV for news, soaps and the like (and there's absolutely nothing wrong with that, I might add), but if a person cares enough to fork out for a fancy OLED, why don't they also care enough to seek out the HDR versions of movies and TV shows?

It's not as if HDR content is particularly hard to find these days. Pretty much every piece of original content on Netflix, Prime Video, Disney+ and Apple TV+ now comes in HDR; most pay-as-you-go movies from the likes of Apple, Amazon and Sky are available in HDR; Premier League football and the F1 are now broadcast in HDR. The list goes on.

Is it a cost thing? I certainly agree that a service such as Sky is expensive if you want it in HDR, but the HDR versions of each streaming service are only a few quid a month more than the SDR subscriptions. I realise that's not nothing, but we're talking about people who have spent a four-figure sum on their TV.

Perhaps people are still watching loads of broadcast TV, which unfortunately still lags a long way behind when it comes to HDR content. Nine-and-a-half hours of broadcast SDR to just half an hour of HDR, though? On a premium OLED TV? That seems rather at odds with the notion that broadcast TV is in heavy decline.

Of course, these are just the figures of one TV brand; but I don't see an obvious reason those of others would be markedly different. Perhaps the data is skewed by Philips being Europe-only, though, and the global percentages of brands such as LG or Samsung, which sell enormous numbers of TVs in slightly more HDR-saturated regions such as the US and Japan, might be a little bit higher; but I would be somewhat surprised if they were significantly so.

So, if very few people are actually watching HDR, are we going to change our HDR-first approach to reviewing TVs? Actually, no. Our logic is that we are writing primarily for enthusiasts. If someone is researching their next TV purchase by reading the in-depth reviews on our site and in our magazine, we believe that's because they really care about the quality of what they watch: they are more likely to pay that little bit extra for the 4K HDR version of a streaming subscription or pay-as-you-go movie; with any luck they might even own a 4K Blu-ray player; HDR sport could be a fixture of their weekends, too. In short, we think they are contributing a lot to those little HDR percentages.

That isn't to say that non-HDR content doesn't matter. We thoroughly test and report on each TV's ability to upscale and upconvert lower-res, SDR content, from broadcast TV to 1080p Blu-rays and old-school DVDs, because being an enthusiast means watching all of that lovely stuff, too. But HDR is TV at its best, and even if these disappointing figures from Philips suggest it might not quite be the present, it is certainly still the future of TV. And, who knows, if we keep talking about HDR, perhaps a few more people will dig it out and realise just how stunning their TV can be.

MORE:

These are the best TVs you can buy right now

Two flagship TV technologies compared: Mini LED vs OLED

Tom Parsons

Tom Parsons has been writing about TV, AV and hi-fi products (not to mention plenty of other 'gadgets' and even cars) for over 15 years. He began his career as What Hi-Fi?'s Staff Writer and is now the TV and AV Editor. In between, he worked as Reviews Editor and then Deputy Editor at Stuff, and over the years has had his work featured in publications such as T3, The Telegraph and Louder. He's also appeared on BBC News, BBC World Service, BBC Radio 4 and Sky Swipe. In his spare time Tom is a runner and gamer.

  • Friesiansam
    Innumerable more important things to worry about than, if people bother with HDR…
    Reply
  • WhiteKnight2020
    Friesiansam said:
    Innumerable more important things to worry about than, if people bother with HDR…
    There are, but this is a site for people who are concerned with such things though.
    Reply
  • daveh75
    It's not really all that surprising when you consider many people are still happily watching low bitrate SD channels (even when an HD variant exists) getting on for nearly 20 years since HD channels first appeared.
    Reply
  • Friesiansam
    WhiteKnight2020 said:
    There are, but this is a site for people who are concerned with such things though.
    Fair enough but, there are also many who care about sound quality, when listening to music but, watch so little TV that it is a very low priority.
    Reply
  • Ferret the Farmer
    Are Philips accounting for gaming though?

    We have a 75" Mini LED Hisense in the media room, and it's used almost exclusively for playing PC games. Every single game released on the PC (and most consoles) now will default to HDR if it detects that it's available.

    The same goes for Dolby Atmos; having a proper, discreet 5.1.2 speaker setup really ups the immersion, and most games will switch to it automatically if it's detected.

    I reckon if they take into account the amount of time people spend playing computer games on their TVs, the figures would probably be quite a bit higher.
    Reply
  • GSV Ethics Gradient
    Why would you be depressed by what others do (or don't)? Doesn't stop you making your own choices, and HDR seems to be here to stay.
    Reply
  • Ferret the Farmer
    12th Monkey said:
    Why would you be depressed by what others do (or don't)? Doesn't stop you making your own choices, and HDR seems to be here to stay.
    Agreed, HDR is here to stay.

    If you look back over the past few decades, any advancement that offers a genuine, tangeable improvement in picture quality and/or convenience has been accepted and stayed on the scene; everyone notices them without having to be familiar with the technicalities.

    405 to 576 lines, colour etc were obvious upgrades. 16:9 aspect ratios offered a more natural viewing experience and wider field of view. Digital TV offered more choice, and the move away from CRTs enabled much larger screen sizes (although I'll take a good ol' Trinitron for retro gaming any day!)

    High Definition drastically increased picture fidelity, and 4K basically became a necessity for the same reason when 55"+ displays became the norm.

    3D, and to an extent, 8K, have fallen by the wayside because neither of them offer a worthwhile upgrade to the viewing experience for the average person on an average sized TV.

    HDR offers a noticeable and easy upgrade in picture quality for everyone, even on smaller, cheaper sets. As such I'm sure it'll become the default standard eventually; it'll just take a little bit of time like the other tech we now take for granted.

    I went into a branch of Hughes a few years back with my mum, who still doesn't know what 4K actually is. But when she spotted a 4K HDR TV on display even she said 'Oh my god, what's that? That's AMAZING!' 😂
    Reply
  • Amadeus1756
    I don’t watch enough TV to subscribe to the myriad streaming services, each of which may have a single series of interest to me at any one time. I wait for the series to end then subscribe to the relevant service for a month and binge watch over a week or so.
    Finding HDR can be hard; BBC (unfortunately) doesn't seem to do very much HDR broadcasting and doesn't allow me to search for it, Apple TV (app) allows you to browse (find) HDR content easily;
    If I subscribed to all the services mentioned in the original article, it’d cost me a decent sum and I’d probably not watch some of them in a given month.
    To me, there needs to be some kind of spotify-like streaming service the allows me to subscribe to one service which offers all I want to watch but I can’t see that as being feasible unless it’s old content.
    Reply
  • Ferret the Farmer
    Amadeus1756 said:
    I don’t watch enough TV to subscribe to the myriad streaming services, each of which may have a single series of interest to me at any one time. I wait for the series to end then subscribe to the relevant service for a month and binge watch over a week or so.
    Finding HDR can be hard; BBC (unfortunately) doesn't seem to do very much HDR broadcasting and doesn't allow me to search for it, Apple TV (app) allows you to browse (find) HDR content easily;
    If I subscribed to all the services mentioned in the original article, it’d cost me a decent sum and I’d probably not watch some of them in a given month.
    To me, there needs to be some kind of spotify-like streaming service the allows me to subscribe to one service which offers all I want to watch but I can’t see that as being feasible unless it’s old content.
    Yeah the fragmentation of streaming services is ridiculous; I have Amazon Prime, but I have more stuff delivered to house than actually watching content on the video platform 😂

    YouTube has a lot of 4K HDR content now. People scoff at YouTube, but there's a lot of decent content about now; Technmoan, Abroad in Japan, This Does Not Compute, Ahoy, etc. Some of Rambalac's night time strolls around urban Japan are probably the best demo videos for 4K HDR I've ever seen.
    Reply