As a user of the Sony HT-A9 Dolby Atmos system, I'm both disappointed and relieved by the imperfect Bravia Theatre Quad

The Bravia Theatre Quad system arranged on a wooden rack. A red badge in the corner of the image says 'Adventures in AV'.
(Image credit: Future)

I didn’t get into home cinema and hi-fi reviewing to get rich (chance would be a fine thing); I got into home cinema and hi-fi reviewing because I love home cinema and hi-fi kit. Even now, seventeen years into my career, I regularly get that tingle of excitement when a new product arrives, and when I’m halfway into a review of something great, I can’t help but daydream about finding a way to get it into my system at home. I also regularly suffer from an affliction that may be familiar to many of you: upgrade-itis.

Regular readers might remember that when I moved house at the start of last year, I agreed not to reinstall my AV receiver and 11.1.4-channel speaker system in the new living room and that I would instead find something less conspicuous for our movie sound. After a couple of months with the Sonos Arc and a brief fling with a pair of HomePods, we settled on the Sony HT-A9 system, and the rest, as they say, is history.

Except, of course, it isn’t.

The rare, momentary audio dropout aside, our year or so with the HT-A9 has been fairly blissful – the Dolby Atmos bubble it presents is really effective, there’s great clarity despite the lack of a physical centre channel and the surprisingly large speakers blend into the room rather neatly – but this is my hobby as well as my job, so I can’t help but cast my eye around for the next thing.

That ‘next thing’ seemed, quite unsurprisingly, to be Sony’s own replacement for the HT-A9, the Bravia Theatre Quad, which I first saw at the launch event in May but which we finally had the chance to review just last week.

Conceptually, the Quad system deviates very little from the HT-A9. It’s a set of four wireless speakers and a control box that together create room-filling Dolby Atmos and DTS:X sound using Sony’s very clever 360 Spatial Sound Mapping. So far, so familiar – but the Quad features some upgrades that appeal to me, and I’m not even talking about the four additional drivers it has.

Sony Bravia Theatre Quads wireless speaker package

(Image credit: What Hi-Fi?)

The first and most obvious of those upgrades is the design of the speakers. I agree that the wide and flat form looks less appealing than the HT-A9’s canister-shaped speakers when standing on a piece of furniture, but they look much better – by which I mean even less noticeable – when wall-mounted.

The Bravia Theatre Quad system also features a new app. This isn’t the sort of thing that I usually get too excited about, but the new app features a new and more advanced calibration system. More advanced calibration generally equates to better sound, particularly for a product that relies so heavily on audio processing.

Finally, the Quad system features a dual antenna and automatic frequency hopping, which means it should never suffer from those very occasional audio dropouts that I’ve experienced with the HT-A9.

All told, the Bravia Theatre Quad sounded like the system that I (and the rest of my family) already love, but made even better, so the upgrade bug had bitten long before our review sample ever arrived.

However, there’s a sting in the tail that revealed itself during our extensive testing. The Bravia Theatre Quad really is an upgrade in the ways I was hoping, and it’s super-clean, crisp and energetic in terms of sound – but it’s also a downgrade in terms of weight and depth. It’s just too lean in its delivery, so it lacks a lot of the richness and solidity of the HT-A9, despite its obvious improvements elsewhere. More than its predecessor, the Theatre Quad really needs the optional subwoofer, which is a bit galling when you consider how much more expensive the new system is compared with the last.

Good though it is overall, given how much I was looking forward to the Sony Bravia Theatre Quad, it was inevitable that I would be disappointed by its shortcomings. But that disappointment eventually turned to relief: I don’t have to find £2499 and go through the hassle of replacing my existing system. Instead, I can be content in the knowledge that I already have the best system for my circumstances. Well, for another week or two at least…

MORE:

Read the full Sony Bravia Theatre Quad vs Sony HT-A9 comparison

Also check out our list of the best soundbars

Tom Parsons

Tom Parsons has been writing about TV, AV and hi-fi products (not to mention plenty of other 'gadgets' and even cars) for over 15 years. He began his career as What Hi-Fi?'s Staff Writer and is now the TV and AV Editor. In between, he worked as Reviews Editor and then Deputy Editor at Stuff, and over the years has had his work featured in publications such as T3, The Telegraph and Louder. He's also appeared on BBC News, BBC World Service, BBC Radio 4 and Sky Swipe. In his spare time Tom is a runner and gamer.

  • Jrnfl
    Tom wrote “As a user of the HT-A9, which does suffer from very occasional and minor dropouts.” I had to laugh at that comment about the occasional and minor dropouts.! My experience is definitely different from Tom’s. I returned my HTA9 system because the drops were so often that it was akin to the sound of a machine gun - bang bang bang - cutting out so frequently. The system has a major design flaw and Sony informed me that it was aware of the problem yet they keep selling the system, anyway, my two cents about my experience with the system .
    Reply
  • manicm
    Also this WHF review is flawed - Sony themselves will tell you the optional subwoofer is a MUST, in both the HT-A9 and the Quad.
    Reply