Leaving aside for one moment the fact that the BD35 decodes HD audio, what are the differences in PQ in comparison to the BD30 and BD50.
It would be very helpful in a review if the picture was compared to the BD30 to quantify any differences in a number of areas including, clarity, colour, contrast, artefact suppression, and most importantly of all IMO, motion handling and in particular, during vertical and horizontal scans at various speeds.
I find the major problem with digital reproduction to be motion handling - nothing detracts from the enjoyment more than 'break up' and phosphor trails during movement.
I do not believe that any system is free from this, DVD or Blu ray, plasma or LCD. I have a BD30 and pana 42PZ85 but have also spent a lot of time (in dealers) assessing the Pioneer 5090. Movement presents problems to some degree in every system I have seen.
The screens play their part in the movement problems but I do think it would be beneficial to indicate player performance with reference to the BD30. I hope I am not on my own in this.