Have your say & ask the experts

fr0g:

JoelSim:

Solomon1:

timwileman:

so was there a conclusion about elvis....?

Elvis is good.

 

Er, he's not. And neither for that matter are The Who. Exactly! Who! It's just noise.

 

Music without melody, or tune, or rythmn isn't music at all (copyright JoelSim 2008).

 

. 

In what way could the music of Elvis, or The Who be considered without melody, rythmn or tune? You haven't got your Dalis wired out of phase have you?Not that that particular set of 'rules' is in any way relevant... much like 'emontion'...One persons Thai green curry is anothers semolina pudding, circa 1975.

Neither of those artists would get anywhere near my front door, let alone my Dalis! The whole rock 'n' roll thing leaves me very cold 

JoelSim:

Er, he's not. And neither for that matter are The Who. Exactly! Who! It's just noise.

 

Music without melody, or tune, or rythmn isn't music at all (copyright JoelSim 2008).

mmmmmh, can you give a single example of a Who track that contains neither melody, tune nor rythmn ?????? Can you name a bass player who is head and shoulders above Entwhistle  ???????

We await your words of wisdom with baited breath.

FlyingScot:

JoelSim:

Er, he's not. And neither for that matter are The Who. Exactly! Who! It's just noise.

 

Music without melody, or tune, or rythmn isn't music at all (copyright JoelSim 2008).

mmmmmh, can you give a single example of a Who track that contains neither melody, tune nor rythmn ?????? Can you name a bass player who is head and shoulders above Entwhistle  ???????

We await your words of wisdom with baited breath.